AMD Radeon Pro 580X vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 580X and AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 580X
- 83.3x lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 12500 million
- 2.2x more memory clock speed: 1695 MHz (6780 MHz effective) vs 786 MHz (1572 MHz effective)
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 12500 million |
Memory clock speed | 1695 MHz (6780 MHz effective) vs 786 MHz (1572 MHz effective) |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48
- Around 9% higher core clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 1100 MHz
- Around 8% higher boost clock speed: 1300 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- Around 44% higher texture fill rate: 249.6 GTexel/s vs 172.8 GTexel/s
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 3072 vs 2304
- Around 50% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 53783 vs 35755
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3947 vs 3643
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3947 vs 3643
- 3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 10411 vs 3360
- 3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 10411 vs 3360
- Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 788 vs 698
- Around 50% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 11289 vs 7540
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 1100 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 249.6 GTexel/s vs 172.8 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 3072 vs 2304 |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 53783 vs 35755 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3947 vs 3643 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3947 vs 3643 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 10411 vs 3360 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 10411 vs 3360 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 788 vs 698 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11289 vs 7540 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 580X
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro 580X | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 35755 | 53783 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3643 | 3947 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3643 | 3947 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 10411 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 10411 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 698 | 788 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7540 | 11289 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 135.416 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3063.269 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.678 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 883.876 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11925 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11925 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro 580X | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Vega 10 PRO |
Code name | Polaris 20 | Greenland |
Launch date | 18 March 2019 | 19 March 2019 |
Place in performance rating | 365 | 232 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
GCN generation | GCN 5.0 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | 1300 MHz |
Compute units | 36 | |
Core clock speed | 1100 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 345.6 GFLOPS | 499.2 GFLOPS |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 5.530 TFLOPS | 15.97 TFLOPS |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.530 TFLOPS | 7.987 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 2304 | 3072 |
Pixel fill rate | 38.40 GPixel/s | 83.20 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 172.8 GTexel/s | 249.6 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 12500 million |
Transistor count | 5700 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.3 | 6.3 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 217.0 GB/s | 402.4 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 2048 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1695 MHz (6780 MHz effective) | 786 MHz (1572 MHz effective) |
Memory type | GDDR5 | HBM2 |
High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
Technologies |
||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) |