AMD Radeon Pro 580X vs NVIDIA Titan X Pascal
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 580X and NVIDIA Titan X Pascal videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 580X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- 503.9x more texture fill rate: 172.8 GTexel/s vs 342.9 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3360 vs 3333
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3360 vs 3333
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 18 March 2019 vs 2 August 2016 |
| Texture fill rate | 172.8 GTexel/s vs 342.9 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 16 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 250 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 vs 3333 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 vs 3333 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Titan X Pascal
- Around 29% higher core clock speed: 1417 MHz vs 1100 MHz
- Around 28% higher boost clock speed: 1531 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- Around 56% higher pipelines: 3584 vs 2304
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 8 GB
- 5.9x more memory clock speed: 10008 MHz vs 1695 MHz (6780 MHz effective)
- Around 71% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 63421 vs 37036
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3696 vs 3643
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3696 vs 3643
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1417 MHz vs 1100 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1531 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
| Pipelines | 3584 vs 2304 |
| Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 8 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 10008 MHz vs 1695 MHz (6780 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 63421 vs 37036 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3696 vs 3643 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3696 vs 3643 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 580X
GPU 2: NVIDIA Titan X Pascal
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro 580X | NVIDIA Titan X Pascal |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 37036 | 63421 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3643 | 3696 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3643 | 3696 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 3333 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 3333 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 698 | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7540 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 165.792 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2368.267 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 17.829 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.354 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 992.132 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10841 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10841 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 9560 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro 580X | NVIDIA Titan X Pascal | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Pascal |
| Code name | Polaris 20 | GP102 |
| Launch date | 18 March 2019 | 2 August 2016 |
| Place in performance rating | 346 | 347 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1,199 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | 1531 MHz |
| Compute units | 36 | |
| Core clock speed | 1100 MHz | 1417 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 16 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 345.6 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 5.530 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.530 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2304 | 3584 |
| Pixel fill rate | 38.40 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 172.8 GTexel/s | 342.9 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Transistor count | 5700 million | 11,800 million |
| Floating-point performance | 10,974 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 217.0 GB/s | 480.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1695 MHz (6780 MHz effective) | 10008 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5X |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro 580X with others
AMDRadeon Pro 580X vs
ATIAll-In-Wonder X1900
AMDRadeon Pro 580X vs
ATIRadeon HD 3850 X2
AMDRadeon Pro 580X vs
NVIDIAGeForce 9800S
AMDRadeon Pro 580X vs
AMDRadeon HD 6650A
AMDRadeon Pro 580X vs
AMDRadeon R9 290
AMDRadeon Pro 580X vs
NVIDIATitan X Pascal
