AMD Radeon Pro SSG vs AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro SSG and AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro SSG
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 60% higher core clock speed: 1440 MHz vs 900 MHz
- Around 62% higher boost clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 925 MHz
- 6.5x more texture fill rate: 384.0 GTexel / s vs 59.2 GTexel / s
- 4x more pipelines: 4096 vs 1024
- 6.5x better floating-point performance: 12,288 gflops vs 1,894 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 75% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11029 vs 6316
- Around 75% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11029 vs 6316
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 8 August 2017 vs 13 March 2015 |
| Core clock speed | 1440 MHz vs 900 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 925 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 384.0 GTexel / s vs 59.2 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 4096 vs 1024 |
| Floating-point performance | 12,288 gflops vs 1,894 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 2 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11029 vs 6316 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11029 vs 6316 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP
- 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 350 Watt
- 2.5x more memory clock speed: 4800 MHz vs 1890 MHz
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8390 vs 7766
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8390 vs 7766
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 350 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 4800 MHz vs 1890 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8390 vs 7766 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8390 vs 7766 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro SSG
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro SSG | AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 10972 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 588 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 170.923 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3178.443 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.732 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 173.59 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1231.051 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11029 | 6316 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7766 | 8390 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11029 | 6316 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7766 | 8390 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 27566 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 27566 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 70535 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro SSG | AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Vega 10 | Pitcairn |
| Launch date | 8 August 2017 | 13 March 2015 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $6,999 | |
| Place in performance rating | 158 | 165 |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1500 MHz | 925 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1440 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 12,288 gflops | 1,894 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 4096 | 1024 |
| Texture fill rate | 384.0 GTexel / s | 59.2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 350 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Transistor count | 12,500 million | 2,800 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 6x mini-DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 483.8 GB / s | 153.6 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 2048 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1890 MHz | 4800 MHz |
| Memory type | HBM2 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro SSG with others
AMDRadeon Pro SSG vs
NVIDIATesla V100 PCIe 32 GB
AMDRadeon Pro SSG vs
AMDRadeon Pro Vega II Duo
AMDRadeon Pro SSG vs
AMDRadeon RX 6600 XT
AMDRadeon Pro SSG vs
AMDRadeon RX 6500 XT
AMDRadeon Pro SSG vs
NVIDIARTX A2000 Embedded
AMDRadeon Pro SSG vs
AppleM1 Pro 14-core
