AMD Radeon Pro SSG vs AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro SSG and AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL.

AMD Radeon Pro SSG

AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro SSG

Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 4 month(s) later
Around 60% higher core clock speed: 1440 MHz vs 900 MHz
Around 62% higher boost clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 925 MHz
6.5x more texture fill rate: 384.0 GTexel / s vs 59.2 GTexel / s
4x more pipelines: 4096 vs 1024
6.5x better floating-point performance: 12,288 gflops vs 1,894 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
8x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 2 GB
Around 75% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11029 vs 6316
Around 75% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11029 vs 6316

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	8 August 2017 vs 13 March 2015
Core clock speed	1440 MHz vs 900 MHz
Boost clock speed	1500 MHz vs 925 MHz
Texture fill rate	384.0 GTexel / s vs 59.2 GTexel / s
Pipelines	4096 vs 1024
Floating-point performance	12,288 gflops vs 1,894 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 28 nm
Maximum memory size	16 GB vs 2 GB
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	11029 vs 6316
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	11029 vs 6316

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP

2.3x lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 350 Watt
2.5x more memory clock speed: 4800 MHz vs 1890 MHz
Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8390 vs 7766
Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8390 vs 7766

Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	150 Watt vs 350 Watt
Memory clock speed	4800 MHz vs 1890 MHz
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	8390 vs 7766
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	8390 vs 7766

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro SSG
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

11029

6316

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

7766

8390

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

11029

6316

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

7766

8390

Name	AMD Radeon Pro SSG	AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP
PassMark - G3D Mark	10972
PassMark - G2D Mark	588
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	170.923
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	3178.443
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	16.732
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	173.59
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	1231.051
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	11029	6316
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	7766	8390
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	11029	6316
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	7766	8390
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)		27566
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)		27566
Geekbench - OpenCL		70535

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon Pro SSG	AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 5.0	GCN 1.0
Code name	Vega 10	Pitcairn
Launch date	8 August 2017	13 March 2015
Launch price (MSRP)	$6,999
Place in performance rating	169	171
Type	Workstation	Desktop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1500 MHz	925 MHz
Core clock speed	1440 MHz	900 MHz
Floating-point performance	12,288 gflops	1,894 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	4096	1024
Texture fill rate	384.0 GTexel / s	59.2 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	350 Watt	150 Watt
Transistor count	12,500 million	2,800 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	6x mini-DisplayPort	2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	267 mm
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	1x 6-pin
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_1)	12.0 (11_1)
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	2 GB
Memory bandwidth	483.8 GB / s	153.6 GB / s
Memory bus width	2048 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1890 MHz	4800 MHz
Memory type	HBM2	GDDR5