AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 vs NVIDIA Titan X Pascal
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 and NVIDIA Titan X Pascal videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 16 nm
- 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 3333
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 3333
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 14 November 2018 vs 2 August 2016 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3333 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3333 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Titan X Pascal
- 4.7x more core clock speed: 1417 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 29% higher boost clock speed: 1531 MHz vs 1190 MHz
- 4.2x more memory clock speed: 10008 MHz vs 2400 MHz
- Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10841 vs 8870
- Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10841 vs 8870
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3696 vs 3586
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3696 vs 3586
- 3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 66950 vs 22421
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1417 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1531 MHz vs 1190 MHz |
Memory clock speed | 10008 MHz vs 2400 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10841 vs 8870 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10841 vs 8870 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3696 vs 3586 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3696 vs 3586 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 66950 vs 22421 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16
GPU 2: NVIDIA Titan X Pascal
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 | NVIDIA Titan X Pascal |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8870 | 10841 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8870 | 10841 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3586 | 3696 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3586 | 3696 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3333 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3333 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 22421 | 66950 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 585 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4809 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 165.792 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2368.267 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 17.829 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.354 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 992.132 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2244 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 | NVIDIA Titan X Pascal | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Pascal |
Code name | Vega 12 | GP102 |
Launch date | 14 November 2018 | 2 August 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 369 | 370 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $1,199 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1190 MHz | 1531 MHz |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1417 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 250 Watt |
Floating-point performance | 10,974 gflops | |
Pipelines | 3584 | |
Texture fill rate | 342.9 GTexel / s | |
Transistor count | 11,800 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Memory clock speed | 2400 MHz | 10008 MHz |
Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 480.4 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | |
Memory type | GDDR5X | |
Shared memory | 0 |