AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 vs NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 and NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 32% higher core clock speed: 1138 MHz vs 861 MHz
- Around 20% higher boost clock speed: 1250 MHz vs 1038 MHz
- 2.3x more texture fill rate: 302.4 GTexel / s vs 132.9 GTexel / s
- Around 75% higher pipelines: 3584 vs 2048
- 2.3x better floating-point performance: 9,677 gflops vs 4,252 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 56% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12354 vs 7915
- Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 828 vs 698
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12822 vs 11804
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3709 vs 3684
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12822 vs 11804
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3709 vs 3684
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 14 August 2017 vs 8 April 2016 |
| Core clock speed | 1138 MHz vs 861 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1250 MHz vs 1038 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 302.4 GTexel / s vs 132.9 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 3584 vs 2048 |
| Floating-point performance | 9,677 gflops vs 4,252 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12354 vs 7915 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 828 vs 698 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12822 vs 11804 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3709 vs 3684 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12822 vs 11804 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3709 vs 3684 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile
- Around 40% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 210 Watt
- 4.5x more memory clock speed: 7012 MHz vs 1572 MHz
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4193 vs 3353
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 4193 vs 3353
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 210 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 7012 MHz vs 1572 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4193 vs 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4193 vs 3353 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 | NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12354 | 7915 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 828 | 698 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 61544 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 153.117 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1722.138 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 11.901 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 126.528 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1172.788 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12822 | 11804 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3709 | 3684 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 4193 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12822 | 11804 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3709 | 3684 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 4193 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 | NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | Vega 10 | GM204 |
| Launch date | 14 August 2017 | 8 April 2016 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | |
| Place in performance rating | 249 | 248 |
| Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1250 MHz | 1038 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1138 MHz | 861 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 9,677 gflops | 4,252 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 3584 | 2048 |
| Texture fill rate | 302.4 GTexel / s | 132.9 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 210 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Transistor count | 12,500 million | 5,200 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 402.4 GB / s | 224.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 2048 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1572 MHz | 7012 MHz |
| Memory type | HBM2 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 with others
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 56 vs
ATIRadeon HD 4850 X2
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 56 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M380
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 56 vs
NVIDIAQuadro M5500 Mobile
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 56 vs
NVIDIATesla P40
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 56 vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 56 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660
