AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY X

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 and AMD Radeon R9 FURY X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• Around 29% higher boost clock speed: 1350 MHz vs 1050 MHz
• Around 29% higher texture fill rate: 345.6 GTexel / s vs 268.8 GTexel / s
• Around 29% better floating-point performance: 11,059 gflops vs 8,602 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 10% lower typical power consumption: 250 Watt vs 275 Watt
• 4x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 4 GB
• Around 50% higher memory clock speed: 1572 MHz vs 1050 MHz
• Around 35% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12920 vs 9577
• Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 12.693 vs 12.49
• Around 63% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1396.172 vs 857.575
• Around 54% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13339 vs 8673
• Around 54% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13339 vs 8673

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 FURY X

• Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 802 vs 797
• Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 155.307 vs 142.691
• Around 98% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3431.249 vs 1729.558
• Around 37% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 153.089 vs 111.376
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8925 vs 3709
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8925 vs 3709

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 FURY X

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	12920 9577
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	797 802
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	142.691 155.307
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1729.558 3431.249
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12.693 12.49
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	111.376 153.089
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1396.172 857.575
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	13339 8673
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3709 8925
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3353 3361
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	13339 8673
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3709 8925
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3353 3361

Compare specifications (specs)