AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64

• Around 3% higher core clock speed: 1250 MHz vs 1215 MHz
• Around 96% higher texture fill rate: 345.6 GTexel / s vs 176.5 GTexel / s
• 2x more pipelines: 4096 vs 2048
• Around 96% better floating-point performance: 11,059 gflops vs 5,648 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 16 nm
• 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
• Around 31% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12920 vs 9891
• Around 89% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 797 vs 422
• Around 73% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 71252 vs 41233
• 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1396.172 vs 692.9

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q

• Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 1379 MHz vs 1350 MHz
• 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 115 Watt vs 250 Watt
• 5.1x more memory clock speed: 8008 MHz vs 1572 MHz
• Around 50% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 214.123 vs 142.691
• Around 33% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2293.496 vs 1729.558
• Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 139.717 vs 111.376
• Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14915 vs 13339
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8902 vs 3709
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8048 vs 3353
• Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14915 vs 13339
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8902 vs 3709
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8048 vs 3353

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	12920 9891
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	797 422
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	71252 41233
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	142.691 214.123
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1729.558 2293.496
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12.693 12.704
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	111.376 139.717
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1396.172 692.9
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	13339 14915
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3709 8902
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3353 8048
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	13339 14915
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3709 8902
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3353 8048

Compare specifications (specs)