AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 versus AMD Radeon R9 FURY X
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 and AMD Radeon R9 FURY X pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 0 mois plus tard
- Environ 29% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1350 MHz versus 1050 MHz
- Environ 29% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 345.6 GTexel / s versus 268.8 GTexel / s
- Environ 29% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 11,059 gflops versus 8,602 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 10% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 250 Watt versus 275 Watt
- 4x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 16 GB versus 4 GB
- Environ 50% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1572 MHz versus 1050 MHz
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 12920 versus 9577
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 12.693 versus 12.49
- Environ 63% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1396.172 versus 857.575
- Environ 54% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13339 versus 8673
- Environ 54% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13339 versus 8673
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 27 June 2017 versus 24 June 2015 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1350 MHz versus 1050 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 345.6 GTexel / s versus 268.8 GTexel / s |
| Performance á point flottant | 11,059 gflops versus 8,602 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt versus 275 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 16 GB versus 4 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1572 MHz versus 1050 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12920 versus 9577 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.693 versus 12.49 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1396.172 versus 857.575 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13339 versus 8673 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13339 versus 8673 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R9 FURY X
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 802 versus 797
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 155.307 versus 142.691
- Environ 98% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3431.249 versus 1729.558
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 153.089 versus 111.376
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8925 versus 3709
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8925 versus 3709
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 802 versus 797 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 155.307 versus 142.691 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3431.249 versus 1729.558 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 153.089 versus 111.376 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8925 versus 3709 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 versus 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8925 versus 3709 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 versus 3353 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 FURY X
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 | AMD Radeon R9 FURY X |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12920 | 9577 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 797 | 802 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 71252 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 142.691 | 155.307 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1729.558 | 3431.249 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.693 | 12.49 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 111.376 | 153.089 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1396.172 | 857.575 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13339 | 8673 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3709 | 8925 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3361 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13339 | 8673 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3709 | 8925 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3361 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5170 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 | AMD Radeon R9 FURY X | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | GCN 3.0 |
| Nom de code | Vega 10 | Fiji |
| Date de sortie | 27 June 2017 | 24 June 2015 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 229 | 231 |
| Genre | Workstation | Desktop |
| Conception | AMD Radeon R9 Fury Series | |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $649 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1350 MHz | 1050 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1250 MHz | |
| Performance á point flottant | 11,059 gflops | 8,602 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 4096 | 4096 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 345.6 GTexel / s | 268.8 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 275 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 12,500 million | 8,900 million |
| Unités de Compute | 64 | |
| Stream Processors | 4096 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Nombre d’écrans Eyefinity | 6 | |
| VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 267 mm | 191 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 2x 8-pin |
| Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 16 GB | 4 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 402.4 GB / s | 512 GB/s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 2048 Bit | 4096 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1572 MHz | 1050 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | HBM2 | High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) |
| Mémoire de la bande passante haute (HBM) | ||
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| DDMA audio | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| FRTC | ||
| HD3D | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TressFX | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 avec des autres
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 64 vs
AMDRadeon R9 FURY X
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 64 vs
NVIDIATesla V100 PCIe 16 GB
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 64 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 64 vs
AMDRadeon VII
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 64 vs
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 48
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 64 vs
AMDRadeon RX 5600M
