AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64
- Environ 3% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1250 MHz versus 1215 MHz
- Environ 96% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 345.6 GTexel / s versus 176.5 GTexel / s
- 2x plus de pipelines: 4096 versus 2048
- Environ 96% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 11,059 gflops versus 5,648 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 16 nm
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 16 GB versus 8 GB
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 12920 versus 9891
- Environ 89% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 797 versus 422
- Environ 73% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 71252 versus 41233
- 2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1396.172 versus 692.9
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1250 MHz versus 1215 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 345.6 GTexel / s versus 176.5 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 4096 versus 2048 |
| Performance á point flottant | 11,059 gflops versus 5,648 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 16 nm |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 16 GB versus 8 GB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12920 versus 9891 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 797 versus 422 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 71252 versus 41233 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1396.172 versus 692.9 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
- Environ 2% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1379 MHz versus 1350 MHz
- 2.2x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 115 Watt versus 250 Watt
- 5.1x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 8008 MHz versus 1572 MHz
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 214.123 versus 142.691
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2293.496 versus 1729.558
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 139.717 versus 111.376
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14915 versus 13339
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8902 versus 3709
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8048 versus 3353
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14915 versus 13339
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8902 versus 3709
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8048 versus 3353
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1379 MHz versus 1350 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt versus 250 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 8008 MHz versus 1572 MHz |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 214.123 versus 142.691 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2293.496 versus 1729.558 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.704 versus 12.693 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 139.717 versus 111.376 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14915 versus 13339 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8902 versus 3709 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8048 versus 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14915 versus 13339 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8902 versus 3709 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8048 versus 3353 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12920 | 9891 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 797 | 422 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 71252 | 41233 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 142.691 | 214.123 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1729.558 | 2293.496 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.693 | 12.704 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 111.376 | 139.717 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1396.172 | 692.9 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13339 | 14915 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3709 | 8902 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 8048 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13339 | 14915 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3709 | 8902 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 8048 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4887 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Pascal |
| Nom de code | Vega 10 | GP104 |
| Date de sortie | 27 June 2017 | 27 June 2017 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 229 | 232 |
| Genre | Workstation | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1350 MHz | 1379 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1250 MHz | 1215 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 11,059 gflops | 5,648 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 16 nm |
| Pipelines | 4096 | 2048 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 345.6 GTexel / s | 176.5 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 115 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 12,500 million | 7,200 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 267 mm | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
| Taille du laptop | large | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 16 GB | 8 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 402.4 GB / s | 256.3 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 2048 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1572 MHz | 8008 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | HBM2 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| Multi-Projection | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 avec des autres
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 64 vs
AMDRadeon R9 FURY X
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 64 vs
NVIDIATesla V100 PCIe 16 GB
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 64 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 64 vs
AMDRadeon VII
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 64 vs
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 48
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 64 vs
AMDRadeon RX 5600M
