AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 vs NVIDIA TITAN Xp
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 and NVIDIA TITAN Xp videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
- Around 7% higher pipelines: 4096 vs 3840
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 12 GB
- 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 111.376 vs 43.083
- Around 23% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1396.172 vs 1139.382
- Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13339 vs 10966
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3709 vs 3686
- Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13339 vs 10966
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3709 vs 3686
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 June 2017 vs 6 April 2017 |
Pipelines | 4096 vs 3840 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 16 nm |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 12 GB |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 111.376 vs 43.083 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1396.172 vs 1139.382 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13339 vs 10966 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3709 vs 3686 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 vs 3343 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13339 vs 10966 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3709 vs 3686 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 vs 3343 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA TITAN Xp
- Around 12% higher core clock speed: 1405 MHz vs 1250 MHz
- Around 17% higher boost clock speed: 1582 MHz vs 1350 MHz
- Around 10% higher texture fill rate: 379.7 GTexel / s vs 345.6 GTexel / s
- Around 10% better floating-point performance: 12,150 gflops vs 11,059 gflops
- 7.3x more memory clock speed: 11408 MHz vs 1572 MHz
- Around 38% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 17881 vs 12920
- Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 934 vs 797
- Around 2% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 72404 vs 71252
- Around 79% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 256.103 vs 142.691
- Around 45% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2513.321 vs 1729.558
- Around 55% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 19.708 vs 12.693
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1405 MHz vs 1250 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1582 MHz vs 1350 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 379.7 GTexel / s vs 345.6 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 12,150 gflops vs 11,059 gflops |
Memory clock speed | 11408 MHz vs 1572 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 17881 vs 12920 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 934 vs 797 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 72404 vs 71252 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 256.103 vs 142.691 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2513.321 vs 1729.558 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 19.708 vs 12.693 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64
GPU 2: NVIDIA TITAN Xp
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 | NVIDIA TITAN Xp |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12920 | 17881 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 797 | 934 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 71252 | 72404 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 142.691 | 256.103 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1729.558 | 2513.321 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.693 | 19.708 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 111.376 | 43.083 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1396.172 | 1139.382 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13339 | 10966 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3709 | 3686 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3343 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13339 | 10966 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3709 | 3686 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3343 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2375 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 | NVIDIA TITAN Xp | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Pascal |
Code name | Vega 10 | GP102 |
Launch date | 27 June 2017 | 6 April 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 228 | 229 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $1,199 | |
Price now | $1,200 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 15.97 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1350 MHz | 1582 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1250 MHz | 1405 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 11,059 gflops | 12,150 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 16 nm |
Pipelines | 4096 | 3840 |
Texture fill rate | 345.6 GTexel / s | 379.7 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 12,500 million | 11,800 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | 267 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 12 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 402.4 GB / s | 547.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 2048 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1572 MHz | 11408 MHz |
Memory type | HBM2 | GDDR5X |