AMD Radeon Pro Vega II vs AMD FirePro W7170M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro Vega II and AMD FirePro W7170M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Vega II
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- 2.2x more core clock speed: 1574 MHz vs 723 MHz
- 4757.9x more texture fill rate: 440.3 GTexel/s vs 92.54 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 4096 vs 2048
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 96% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 99518 vs 50809
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16149 vs 6796
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16149 vs 6796
- Around 84% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 768 vs 418
- 4.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 15475 vs 3162
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | Dec 2019 vs 2 October 2015 |
Core clock speed | 1574 MHz vs 723 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 440.3 GTexel/s vs 92.54 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 4096 vs 2048 |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 28 nm |
Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 4 GB |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 99518 vs 50809 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16149 vs 6796 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16149 vs 6796 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 768 vs 418 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 15475 vs 3162 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W7170M
- 4.8x lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 475 Watt
- 3.1x more memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 1612 MHz
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3722 vs 3100
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3722 vs 3100
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3362 vs 2813
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3362 vs 2813
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 475 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz vs 1612 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3722 vs 3100 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3722 vs 3100 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3362 vs 2813 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3362 vs 2813 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro Vega II
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W7170M
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro Vega II | AMD FirePro W7170M |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 99518 | 50809 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16149 | 6796 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16149 | 6796 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3100 | 3722 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3100 | 3722 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2813 | 3362 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2813 | 3362 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 768 | 418 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 15475 | 3162 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro Vega II | AMD FirePro W7170M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.1 | GCN 3.0 |
Code name | Vega 20 | Amethyst |
Launch date | Dec 2019 | 2 October 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 166 | 420 |
Type | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1720 MHz | |
Compute units | 64 | |
Core clock speed | 1574 MHz | 723 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 880.6 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 28.18 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 14.09 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 4096 | 2048 |
Pixel fill rate | 110.1 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 440.3 GTexel/s | 92.54 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 475 Watt | 100 Watt |
Transistor count | 13230 million | 5,000 million |
Floating-point performance | 2,961 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 4x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 850 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Width | Dual-slot | |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 825.3 GB/s | 160.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 4096 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1612 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory type | HBM2 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
Enduro |