AMD Radeon Pro Vega II vs NVIDIA Quadro T1000
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro Vega II and NVIDIA Quadro T1000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Vega II
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
- Around 13% higher core clock speed: 1574 MHz vs 1395 MHz
- Around 18% higher boost clock speed: 1720 MHz vs 1455 MHz
- 6.3x more texture fill rate: 440.3 GTexel/s vs 69.84 GTexel/s
- 5.3x more pipelines: 4096 vs 768
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 4 GB
- 3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 99542 vs 32981
- Around 79% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16149 vs 9009
- Around 79% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16149 vs 9009
- Around 82% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 768 vs 421
- 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 15475 vs 6598
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | Dec 2019 vs 27 May 2019 |
| Core clock speed | 1574 MHz vs 1395 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1720 MHz vs 1455 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 440.3 GTexel/s vs 69.84 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 4096 vs 768 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 12 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 4 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 99542 vs 32981 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16149 vs 9009 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16149 vs 9009 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 768 vs 421 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 15475 vs 6598 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T1000
- 9.5x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 475 Watt
- 5x more memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 1612 MHz
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 vs 3100
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 vs 3100
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 2813
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 2813
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 475 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz vs 1612 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3100 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3100 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 2813 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 2813 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro Vega II
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro T1000
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro Vega II | NVIDIA Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 99542 | 32981 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16149 | 9009 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16149 | 9009 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3100 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3100 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2813 | 3359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2813 | 3359 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 768 | 421 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 15475 | 6598 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 87.83 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro Vega II | NVIDIA Quadro T1000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 5.1 | Turing |
| Code name | Vega 20 | TU117 |
| Launch date | Dec 2019 | 27 May 2019 |
| Place in performance rating | 166 | 391 |
| Type | Laptop | Mobile Workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1720 MHz | 1455 MHz |
| Compute units | 64 | |
| Core clock speed | 1574 MHz | 1395 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 880.6 GFLOPS (1:16) | 69.84 GFLOPS |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 28.18 TFLOPS (2:1) | 4.470 TFLOPS |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 14.09 TFLOPS | 2.235 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 4096 | 768 |
| Pixel fill rate | 110.1 GPixel/s | 46.56 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 440.3 GTexel/s | 69.84 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 475 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Transistor count | 13230 million | 4700 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 4x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 850 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Width | Dual-slot | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
| Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 825.3 GB/s | 128 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 4096 bit | 128 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1612 MHz | 8000 MHz |
| Memory type | HBM2 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro Vega II with others
AMDRadeon Pro Vega II vs
AMDRadeon HD 7670A
AMDRadeon Pro Vega II vs
AMDRadeon R9 270 1024SP
AMDRadeon Pro Vega II vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
AMDRadeon Pro Vega II vs
NVIDIARTX A3000 Mobile
AMDRadeon Pro Vega II vs
NVIDIARTX A1000 Mobile 6GB
AMDRadeon Pro Vega II vs
NVIDIACMP 40HX
