AMD Radeon Pro W5500 vs NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W5500 and NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W5500
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- 1272.7x more texture fill rate: 123.2 GTexel/s vs 96.8 GTexel / s
- Around 10% higher pipelines: 1408 vs 1280
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6 GB
| Launch date | 10 Feb 2020 vs 21 February 2018 |
| Texture fill rate | 123.2 GTexel/s vs 96.8 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1408 vs 1280 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 16 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 6 GB |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile
- Around 12% higher core clock speed: 1328 MHz vs 1187 MHz
- Around 5% higher boost clock speed: 1476 MHz vs 1400 MHz
- Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 125 Watt
- 4x more memory clock speed: 7012 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective)
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12948 vs 12184
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 vs 3463
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12948 vs 12184
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 vs 3463
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1328 MHz vs 1187 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1476 MHz vs 1400 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 125 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 7012 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12948 vs 12184 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3463 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12948 vs 12184 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3463 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3355 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W5500
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro W5500 | NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 130.7 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2361.73 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.641 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 135.462 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 774.974 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12184 | 12948 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3463 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12184 | 12948 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3463 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3358 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8920 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 457 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 32521 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro W5500 | NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Pascal |
| Code name | Navi 14 | GP104 |
| Launch date | 10 Feb 2020 | 21 February 2018 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | |
| Place in performance rating | 330 | 334 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1400 MHz | 1476 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1187 MHz | 1328 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 16 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 246.4 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 7.885 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.942 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 1408 | 1280 |
| Pixel fill rate | 44.80 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 123.2 GTexel/s | 96.8 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Transistor count | 6400 million | 7,200 million |
| Floating-point performance | 3,098 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Length | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Width | Single-slot | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 168.3 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 192 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) | 7012 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro W5500 with others
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
ATIRadeon X1950 CrossFire Edition
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
AMDRadeon RX 580
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega M GH
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
NVIDIAT550 Mobile
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
NVIDIACMP 30HX
