AMD Radeon Pro W5500 vs NVIDIA Quadro T1000

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W5500 and NVIDIA Quadro T1000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.

AMD Radeon Pro W5500

NVIDIA Quadro T1000

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W5500

Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
Around 76% higher texture fill rate: 123.2 GTexel/s vs 69.84 GTexel/s
Around 83% higher pipelines: 1408 vs 768
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
Around 49% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 130.7 vs 87.83
Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12184 vs 9009
Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12184 vs 9009

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	10 Feb 2020 vs 27 May 2019
Texture fill rate	123.2 GTexel/s vs 69.84 GTexel/s
Pipelines	1408 vs 768
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm vs 12 nm
Maximum memory size	8 GB vs 4 GB
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	130.7 vs 87.83
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	12184 vs 9009
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	12184 vs 9009

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T1000

Around 18% higher core clock speed: 1395 MHz vs 1187 MHz
Around 4% higher boost clock speed: 1455 MHz vs 1400 MHz
2.5x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 125 Watt
4.6x more memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective)
Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 vs 3463
Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 vs 3463

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	1395 MHz vs 1187 MHz
Boost clock speed	1455 MHz vs 1400 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	50 Watt vs 125 Watt
Memory clock speed	8000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective)
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3718 vs 3463
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3359 vs 3355
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3718 vs 3463
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3359 vs 3355

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W5500
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro T1000

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

130.7

87.83

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

12184

9009

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3463

3718

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3355

3359

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

12184

9009

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3463

3718

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3355

3359

Name	AMD Radeon Pro W5500	NVIDIA Quadro T1000
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	130.7	87.83
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	2361.73
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	13.641
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	135.462
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	774.974
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	12184	9009
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3463	3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3355	3359
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	12184	9009
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3463	3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3355	3359
PassMark - G3D Mark		6591
PassMark - G2D Mark		419
Geekbench - OpenCL		32981

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon Pro W5500	NVIDIA Quadro T1000
Essentials
Architecture	RDNA 1.0	Turing
Code name	Navi 14	TU117
Launch date	10 Feb 2020	27 May 2019
Launch price (MSRP)	$399
Place in performance rating	330	391
Type	Desktop	Mobile Workstation
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1400 MHz	1455 MHz
Core clock speed	1187 MHz	1395 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	12 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	246.4 GFLOPS (1:16)	69.84 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	7.885 TFLOPS (2:1)	4.470 TFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	3.942 TFLOPS	2.235 TFLOPS
Pipelines	1408	768
Pixel fill rate	44.80 GPixel/s	46.56 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	123.2 GTexel/s	69.84 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	125 Watt	50 Watt
Transistor count	6400 million	4700 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	4x DisplayPort	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x8	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	267 mm (10.5 inches)
Recommended system power (PSU)	350 Watt
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	None
Width	Single-slot
API support
DirectX	12.1	12.1
OpenCL	2.0	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Shader Model	6.5	6.4
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	4 GB
Memory bandwidth	224 GB/s	128 GB/s
Memory bus width	128 bit	128 bit
Memory clock speed	1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective)	8000 MHz
Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR5