AMD Radeon Pro W5500M vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W5500M and NVIDIA Quadro P2000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W5500M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- 1347.1x more texture fill rate: 127.6 GTexel/s vs 94.72 GTexel / s
- Around 83% higher pipelines: 1408 vs 768
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 3681
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 3681
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 3316
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 3316
- Around 99% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 45563 vs 22897
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 10 Feb 2020 vs 6 February 2017 |
Texture fill rate | 127.6 GTexel/s vs 94.72 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1408 vs 768 |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 16 nm |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 vs 3681 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 vs 3681 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 3316 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 3316 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 45563 vs 22897 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P2000
- Around 8% higher core clock speed: 1076 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 1480 MHz vs 1450 MHz
- Around 13% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 85 Watt
- Around 25% higher maximum memory size: 5 GB vs 4 GB
- 4.7x more memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10251 vs 9943
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10251 vs 9943
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1076 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1480 MHz vs 1450 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 85 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 5 GB vs 4 GB |
Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10251 vs 9943 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10251 vs 9943 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W5500M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P2000
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro W5500M | NVIDIA Quadro P2000 |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 3681 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 3681 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3316 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3316 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9943 | 10251 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9943 | 10251 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 45563 | 22897 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6926 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 634 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 113.416 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1414.794 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.736 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 81.206 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 417.823 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2958 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro W5500M | NVIDIA Quadro P2000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Pascal |
Code name | Navi 14 | GP106 |
Launch date | 10 Feb 2020 | 6 February 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 404 | 403 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $585 | |
Price now | $429.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 19.44 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1450 MHz | 1480 MHz |
Compute units | 22 | |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 1076 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 255.2 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.166 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.083 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1408 | 768 |
Pixel fill rate | 46.40 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 127.6 GTexel/s | 94.72 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 6400 million | 4,400 million |
Floating-point performance | 3,031 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Length | 201 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 5 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 192.0 GB/s | 140.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) | 7008 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |