AMD Radeon Pro W5500M vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W5500M and NVIDIA Quadro P2000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

AMD Radeon Pro W5500M

NVIDIA Quadro P2000

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W5500M

Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 0 month(s) later
1347.1x more texture fill rate: 127.6 GTexel/s vs 94.72 GTexel / s
Around 83% higher pipelines: 1408 vs 768
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 16 nm
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 3681
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 3681
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 3316
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 3316
Around 99% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 45574 vs 22879

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	10 Feb 2020 vs 6 February 2017
Texture fill rate	127.6 GTexel/s vs 94.72 GTexel / s
Pipelines	1408 vs 768
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm vs 16 nm
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3715 vs 3681
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3715 vs 3681
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3356 vs 3316
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3356 vs 3316
Geekbench - OpenCL	45574 vs 22879

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P2000

Around 8% higher core clock speed: 1076 MHz vs 1000 MHz
Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 1480 MHz vs 1450 MHz
Around 13% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 85 Watt
Around 25% higher maximum memory size: 5 GB vs 4 GB
4.7x more memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10251 vs 9943
Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10251 vs 9943

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	1076 MHz vs 1000 MHz
Boost clock speed	1480 MHz vs 1450 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	75 Watt vs 85 Watt
Maximum memory size	5 GB vs 4 GB
Memory clock speed	7008 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	10251 vs 9943
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	10251 vs 9943

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W5500M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P2000

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3715

3681

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3715

3681

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3356

3316

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3356

3316

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

9943

10251

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

9943

10251

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

45574

22879

Name	AMD Radeon Pro W5500M	NVIDIA Quadro P2000
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3715	3681
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3715	3681
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3356	3316
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3356	3316
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	9943	10251
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	9943	10251
Geekbench - OpenCL	45574	22879
PassMark - G3D Mark		6925
PassMark - G2D Mark		636
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		113.416
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		1414.794
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		6.736
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		81.206
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		417.823
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		2958

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon Pro W5500M	NVIDIA Quadro P2000
Essentials
Architecture	RDNA 1.0	Pascal
Code name	Navi 14	GP106
Launch date	10 Feb 2020	6 February 2017
Place in performance rating	406	403
Type	Laptop	Workstation
Launch price (MSRP)		$585
Price now		$429.99
Value for money (0-100)		19.44
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1450 MHz	1480 MHz
Compute units	22
Core clock speed	1000 MHz	1076 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	16 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	255.2 GFLOPS (1:16)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	8.166 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	4.083 TFLOPS
Pipelines	1408	768
Pixel fill rate	46.40 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	127.6 GTexel/s	94.72 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	85 Watt	75 Watt
Transistor count	6400 million	4,400 million
Floating-point performance		3,031 gflops
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	4x DisplayPort
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x8	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Length		201 mm
API support
DirectX	12.1	12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL	2.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Shader Model	6.5
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	5 GB
Memory bandwidth	192.0 GB/s	140.2 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)	7008 MHz
Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR5