AMD Radeon Pro W5500M vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W5500M and NVIDIA Quadro P2000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W5500M

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 0 month(s) later
  • 1347.1x more texture fill rate: 127.6 GTexel/s vs 94.72 GTexel / s
  • Around 83% higher pipelines: 1408 vs 768
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 16 nm
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 3681
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 3681
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 3316
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 3316
  • Around 99% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 45563 vs 22897
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 10 Feb 2020 vs 6 February 2017
Texture fill rate 127.6 GTexel/s vs 94.72 GTexel / s
Pipelines 1408 vs 768
Manufacturing process technology 7 nm vs 16 nm
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3715 vs 3681
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3715 vs 3681
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3356 vs 3316
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3356 vs 3316
Geekbench - OpenCL 45563 vs 22897

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P2000

  • Around 8% higher core clock speed: 1076 MHz vs 1000 MHz
  • Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 1480 MHz vs 1450 MHz
  • Around 13% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 85 Watt
  • Around 25% higher maximum memory size: 5 GB vs 4 GB
  • 4.7x more memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
  • Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10251 vs 9943
  • Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10251 vs 9943
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 1076 MHz vs 1000 MHz
Boost clock speed 1480 MHz vs 1450 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 75 Watt vs 85 Watt
Maximum memory size 5 GB vs 4 GB
Memory clock speed 7008 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 10251 vs 9943
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 10251 vs 9943

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W5500M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P2000

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3715
3681
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3715
3681
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3356
3316
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3356
3316
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
9943
10251
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
9943
10251
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
45563
22897
Name AMD Radeon Pro W5500M NVIDIA Quadro P2000
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3715 3681
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3715 3681
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3356 3316
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3356 3316
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 9943 10251
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 9943 10251
Geekbench - OpenCL 45563 22897
PassMark - G3D Mark 6926
PassMark - G2D Mark 634
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 113.416
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1414.794
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 6.736
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 81.206
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 417.823
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 2958

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon Pro W5500M NVIDIA Quadro P2000

Essentials

Architecture RDNA 1.0 Pascal
Code name Navi 14 GP106
Launch date 10 Feb 2020 6 February 2017
Place in performance rating 404 403
Type Laptop Workstation
Launch price (MSRP) $585
Price now $429.99
Value for money (0-100) 19.44

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1450 MHz 1480 MHz
Compute units 22
Core clock speed 1000 MHz 1076 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 7 nm 16 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 255.2 GFLOPS (1:16)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 8.166 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 4.083 TFLOPS
Pipelines 1408 768
Pixel fill rate 46.40 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 127.6 GTexel/s 94.72 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 85 Watt 75 Watt
Transistor count 6400 million 4,400 million
Floating-point performance 3,031 gflops

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 4x DisplayPort

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 4.0 x8 PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None None
Length 201 mm

API support

DirectX 12.1 12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL 2.0
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Shader Model 6.5
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 5 GB
Memory bandwidth 192.0 GB/s 140.2 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) 7008 MHz
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR5