AMD Radeon Pro W5700 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W5700 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W5700
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 15% higher boost clock speed: 1930 MHz vs 1683 MHz
- 1375.7x more texture fill rate: 277.9 GTexel/s vs 202.0 GTexel / s
- Around 20% higher pipelines: 2304 vs 1920
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 16 nm
- 1750x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 8 GB/s
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 vs 3691
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 vs 3691
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3360 vs 3340
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3360 vs 3340
- Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 922 vs 851
- Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 15222 vs 13508
- Around 54% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 69098 vs 44918
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 19 Nov 2019 vs 10 June 2016 |
| Boost clock speed | 1930 MHz vs 1683 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 277.9 GTexel/s vs 202.0 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2304 vs 1920 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 16 nm |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 8 GB/s |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3691 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3691 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 vs 3340 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 vs 3340 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 922 vs 851 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 15222 vs 13508 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 69098 vs 44918 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)
- Around 21% higher core clock speed: 1506 MHz vs 1243 MHz
- Around 37% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 205 Watt
- Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13765 vs 11065
- Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13765 vs 11065
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1506 MHz vs 1243 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 205 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13765 vs 11065 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13765 vs 11065 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W5700
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro W5700 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop) |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3691 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3691 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 3340 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 3340 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 922 | 851 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 15222 | 13508 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 69098 | 44918 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11065 | 13765 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11065 | 13765 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 150.951 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1718.593 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.283 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 28.289 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 710.366 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 6066 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro W5700 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop) | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Pascal |
| Code name | Navi 10 | GP104 |
| Launch date | 19 Nov 2019 | 10 June 2016 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $799 | $379 |
| Place in performance rating | 194 | 278 |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
| Price now | $359.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 45.72 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1930 MHz | 1683 MHz |
| Compute units | 36 | |
| Core clock speed | 1243 MHz | 1506 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 16 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 555.8 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 17.79 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 8.893 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2304 | 1920 |
| Pixel fill rate | 123.5 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 277.9 GTexel/s | 202.0 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 205 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Transistor count | 10300 million | 7,200 million |
| CUDA cores | 1920 | |
| Floating-point performance | 6,463 gflops | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 94 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 5x mini-DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, DP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 12 inches (305 mm) | 10.5" (26.7 cm) |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | 500 Watt |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Width | Dual-slot | 2-slot |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 256 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 8 GB/s |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Ansel | ||
| CUDA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| ShadowWorks | ||
| SLI | ||
| Virtual Reality | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro W5700 with others
AMDRadeon Pro W5700 vs
AMDRadeon PRO WX 9100
AMDRadeon Pro W5700 vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000
AMDRadeon Pro W5700 vs
AMDRadeon RX 5600 XT
AMDRadeon Pro W5700 vs
AMDRadeon Pro VII
AMDRadeon Pro W5700 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
AMDRadeon Pro W5700 vs
AMDRadeon 780M
