AMD Radeon Pro W5700 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W5700 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W5700
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 11% higher boost clock speed: 1930 MHz vs 1733 MHz
- 1002.2x more texture fill rate: 277.9 GTexel/s vs 277.3 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 16 nm
- 1400x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 10 GB/s
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 vs 3690
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 vs 3690
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3360 vs 3343
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3360 vs 3343
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 904 vs 887
- Around 25% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 69290 vs 55548
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 19 Nov 2019 vs 27 May 2016 |
| Boost clock speed | 1930 MHz vs 1733 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 277.9 GTexel/s vs 277.3 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 16 nm |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 10 GB/s |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3690 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3690 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 vs 3343 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 vs 3343 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 904 vs 887 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 69290 vs 55548 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
- Around 29% higher core clock speed: 1607 MHz vs 1243 MHz
- Around 11% higher pipelines: 2560 vs 2304
- Around 14% lower typical power consumption: 180 Watt vs 205 Watt
- Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 15578 vs 14707
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11173 vs 11065
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11173 vs 11065
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1607 MHz vs 1243 MHz |
| Pipelines | 2560 vs 2304 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt vs 205 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 15578 vs 14707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11173 vs 11065 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11173 vs 11065 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W5700
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro W5700 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop) |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3690 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3690 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 3343 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 3343 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 904 | 887 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 14707 | 15578 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 69290 | 55548 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11065 | 11173 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11065 | 11173 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 150.103 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2036.763 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.035 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.417 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 819.934 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1560 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro W5700 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop) | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Pascal |
| Code name | Navi 10 | GP104 |
| Launch date | 19 Nov 2019 | 27 May 2016 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $799 | $599 |
| Place in performance rating | 206 | 281 |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
| Price now | $439.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 43.72 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1930 MHz | 1733 MHz |
| Compute units | 36 | |
| Core clock speed | 1243 MHz | 1607 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 16 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 555.8 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 17.79 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 8.893 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2304 | 2560 |
| Pixel fill rate | 123.5 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 277.9 GTexel/s | 277.3 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 205 Watt | 180 Watt |
| Transistor count | 10300 million | 7,200 million |
| CUDA cores | 2560 | |
| Floating-point performance | 8,873 gflops | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 94 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 5x mini-DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | DP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, DL-DVI, 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 12 inches (305 mm) | 10.5" (26.7 cm) |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | 500 Watt |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Width | Dual-slot | 2-slot |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 320 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 10 GB/s |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Ansel | ||
| CUDA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| Multi-Projection | ||
| ShadowWorks | ||
| SLI | ||
| Virtual Reality | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro W5700 with others
AMDRadeon Pro W5700 vs
AMDRadeon R9 295X2
AMDRadeon Pro W5700 vs
NVIDIAQuadro P6000
AMDRadeon Pro W5700 vs
AMDRadeon Pro 5300
AMDRadeon Pro W5700 vs
AppleA14 Bionic
AMDRadeon Pro W5700 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 OEM
AMDRadeon Pro W5700 vs
AMDRadeon RX 6550M
