AMD Radeon Pro W5700 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W5700 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W5700
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 22% higher boost clock speed: 1930 MHz vs 1582 MHz
- 784.1x more texture fill rate: 277.9 GTexel/s vs 354.4 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 22% lower typical power consumption: 205 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 27% higher memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 11008 MHz
- Around 4% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 70217 vs 67595
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 19 Nov 2019 vs 10 March 2017 |
Boost clock speed | 1930 MHz vs 1582 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 277.9 GTexel/s vs 354.4 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 205 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 11008 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 vs 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 vs 3357 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 70217 vs 67595 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
- Around 19% higher core clock speed: 1481 MHz vs 1243 MHz
- Around 56% higher pipelines: 3584 vs 2304
- Around 38% higher maximum memory size: 11 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 933 vs 902
- Around 25% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 18564 vs 14805
- Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 15019 vs 11065
- Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 15019 vs 11065
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1481 MHz vs 1243 MHz |
Pipelines | 3584 vs 2304 |
Maximum memory size | 11 GB vs 8 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 933 vs 902 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 18564 vs 14805 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15019 vs 11065 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15019 vs 11065 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W5700
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro W5700 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 3357 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 902 | 933 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14805 | 18564 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 70217 | 67595 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11065 | 15019 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11065 | 15019 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 205.837 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2406.499 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 19.591 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 25.833 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1002.573 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 9874 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro W5700 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Pascal |
Code name | Navi 10 | GP102 |
Launch date | 19 Nov 2019 | 10 March 2017 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $799 | $699 |
Place in performance rating | 203 | 206 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Price now | $826.98 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 27.48 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1930 MHz | 1582 MHz |
Compute units | 36 | |
Core clock speed | 1243 MHz | 1481 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 555.8 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 17.79 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 8.893 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2304 | 3584 |
Pixel fill rate | 123.5 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 277.9 GTexel/s | 354.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 205 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 10300 million | 11,800 million |
Floating-point performance | 11,340 gflops | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 91 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 5x mini-DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
G-SYNC support | ||
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 12 inches (305 mm) | 10.5" (26.7 cm) |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | 600 Watt |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Width | Dual-slot | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 11 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 484.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 352 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 11008 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5X |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
HDMI 2.0b | ||
PCIe 3.0 | ||
SLI | ||
Virtual Reality |