AMD Radeon Pro W5700 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W5700 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W5700
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 24% higher core clock speed: 1243 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 80% higher boost clock speed: 1930 MHz vs 1075 MHz
- 1579x more texture fill rate: 277.9 GTexel/s vs 176 billion / sec
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 22% lower typical power consumption: 205 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6 GB
- 2000x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 vs 3695
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 vs 3695
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3360 vs 3338
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3360 vs 3338
- Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 922 vs 855
- Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 15222 vs 13812
- Around 83% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 69154 vs 37788
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11065 vs 10471
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11065 vs 10471
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 19 Nov 2019 vs 2 June 2015 |
| Core clock speed | 1243 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1930 MHz vs 1075 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 277.9 GTexel/s vs 176 billion / sec |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 205 Watt vs 250 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 6 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3695 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3695 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 vs 3338 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 vs 3338 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 922 vs 855 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 15222 vs 13812 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 69154 vs 37788 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11065 vs 10471 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11065 vs 10471 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
- Around 22% higher pipelines: 2816 vs 2304
| Pipelines | 2816 vs 2304 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W5700
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro W5700 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3695 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3695 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 3338 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 3338 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 922 | 855 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 15222 | 13812 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 69154 | 37788 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11065 | 10471 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11065 | 10471 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 145.843 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1722.98 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 11.661 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 37.16 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 788.464 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5757 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro W5700 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | Navi 10 | GM200 |
| Launch date | 19 Nov 2019 | 2 June 2015 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $799 | $649 |
| Place in performance rating | 193 | 297 |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
| Price now | $679.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 23.43 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1930 MHz | 1075 MHz |
| Compute units | 36 | |
| Core clock speed | 1243 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 555.8 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 17.79 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 8.893 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2304 | 2816 |
| Pixel fill rate | 123.5 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 277.9 GTexel/s | 176 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 205 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Transistor count | 10300 million | 8,000 million |
| CUDA cores | 2816 | |
| Floating-point performance | 6,060 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 5x mini-DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2 |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 12 inches (305 mm) | 10.5" (26.7 cm) |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | 600 Watt |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Width | Dual-slot | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | 4x | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 336.5 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 7.0 GB/s |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Adaptive Vertical Sync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| GameStream | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| SLI | ||
| Surround | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro W5700 with others
AMDRadeon Pro W5700 vs
AMDRadeon PRO WX 9100
AMDRadeon Pro W5700 vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000
AMDRadeon Pro W5700 vs
AMDRadeon RX 5600 XT
AMDRadeon Pro W5700 vs
AMDRadeon Pro VII
AMDRadeon Pro W5700 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
AMDRadeon Pro W5700 vs
AMDRadeon 780M
