AMD Radeon Pro W5700 vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W5700 and NVIDIA Quadro P2000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

AMD Radeon Pro W5700

NVIDIA Quadro P2000

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W5700

Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 9 month(s) later
Around 16% higher core clock speed: 1243 MHz vs 1076 MHz
Around 30% higher boost clock speed: 1930 MHz vs 1480 MHz
2933.9x more texture fill rate: 277.9 GTexel/s vs 94.72 GTexel / s
3x more pipelines: 2304 vs 768
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 16 nm
Around 60% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 5 GB
2x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 7008 MHz
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 vs 3681
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 vs 3681
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3360 vs 3316
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3360 vs 3316
Around 43% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 904 vs 630
2.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 14707 vs 6957
3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 69290 vs 22896
Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11065 vs 10251
Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11065 vs 10251

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	19 Nov 2019 vs 6 February 2017
Core clock speed	1243 MHz vs 1076 MHz
Boost clock speed	1930 MHz vs 1480 MHz
Texture fill rate	277.9 GTexel/s vs 94.72 GTexel / s
Pipelines	2304 vs 768
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm vs 16 nm
Maximum memory size	8 GB vs 5 GB
Memory clock speed	14000 MHz vs 7008 MHz
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3718 vs 3681
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3718 vs 3681
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3360 vs 3316
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3360 vs 3316
PassMark - G2D Mark	904 vs 630
PassMark - G3D Mark	14707 vs 6957
Geekbench - OpenCL	69290 vs 22896
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	11065 vs 10251
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	11065 vs 10251

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P2000

2.7x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 205 Watt

Thermal Design Power (TDP)	75 Watt vs 205 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W5700
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P2000

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3718

3681

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3718

3681

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3360

3316

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3360

3316

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

904

630

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

14707

6957

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

69290

22896

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

11065

10251

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

11065

10251

Name	AMD Radeon Pro W5700	NVIDIA Quadro P2000
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3718	3681
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3718	3681
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3360	3316
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3360	3316
PassMark - G2D Mark	904	630
PassMark - G3D Mark	14707	6957
Geekbench - OpenCL	69290	22896
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	11065	10251
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	11065	10251
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		113.416
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		1414.794
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		6.736
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		81.206
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		417.823
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		2958

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon Pro W5700	NVIDIA Quadro P2000
Essentials
Architecture	RDNA 1.0	Pascal
Code name	Navi 10	GP106
Launch date	19 Nov 2019	6 February 2017
Launch price (MSRP)	$799	$585
Place in performance rating	206	387
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Price now		$429.99
Value for money (0-100)		19.44
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1930 MHz	1480 MHz
Compute units	36
Core clock speed	1243 MHz	1076 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	16 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	555.8 GFLOPS (1:16)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	17.79 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	8.893 TFLOPS
Pipelines	2304	768
Pixel fill rate	123.5 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	277.9 GTexel/s	94.72 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	205 Watt	75 Watt
Transistor count	10300 million	4,400 million
Floating-point performance		3,031 gflops
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	5x mini-DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C	4x DisplayPort
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	12 inches (305 mm)	201 mm
Recommended system power (PSU)	550 Watt
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	None
Width	Dual-slot
API support
DirectX	12.1	12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL	2.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Shader Model	6.4
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	5 GB
Memory bandwidth	448 GB/s	140.2 GB / s
Memory bus width	256 bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	14000 MHz	7008 MHz
Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR5