AMD Radeon Pro W6600M vs AMD FirePro W9100

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W6600M and AMD FirePro W9100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 2 month(s) later
  • 2.4x more core clock speed: 2200 MHz vs 930 MHz
  • 1985.9x more texture fill rate: 325.1 GTexel/s vs 163.7 GTexel / s
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
  • 9.4x lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 750 Watt
  • Around 67% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 15257 vs 9143
  • Around 67% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 15257 vs 9143
  • Around 39% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 10806 vs 7748
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 8 Jun 2021 vs 26 March 2014
Core clock speed 2200 MHz vs 930 MHz
Texture fill rate 325.1 GTexel/s vs 163.7 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology 7 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 80 Watt vs 750 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 15257 vs 9143
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 15257 vs 9143
PassMark - G3D Mark 10806 vs 7748

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W9100

  • Around 57% higher pipelines: 2816 vs 1792
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
  • 2.9x more memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective)
  • 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8219 vs 3716
  • 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8219 vs 3716
  • 9.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 32085 vs 3358
  • 9.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 32085 vs 3358
  • Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 796 vs 760
Specifications (specs)
Pipelines 2816 vs 1792
Maximum memory size 16 GB vs 8 GB
Memory clock speed 5000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective)
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 8219 vs 3716
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 8219 vs 3716
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 32085 vs 3358
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 32085 vs 3358
PassMark - G2D Mark 796 vs 760

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W6600M
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W9100

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
15257
9143
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
15257
9143
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3716
8219
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3716
8219
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3358
32085
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3358
32085
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
760
796
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
10806
7748
Name AMD Radeon Pro W6600M AMD FirePro W9100
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 15257 9143
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 15257 9143
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3716 8219
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3716 8219
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3358 32085
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3358 32085
PassMark - G2D Mark 760 796
PassMark - G3D Mark 10806 7748
Geekbench - OpenCL 43046
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 106.585
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1878.403
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 9.751
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 82.208
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 511.115

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon Pro W6600M AMD FirePro W9100

Essentials

Architecture RDNA 2.0 GCN 2.0
Code name Navi 23 Hawaii
Launch date 8 Jun 2021 26 March 2014
Place in performance rating 191 201
Type Workstation

Technical info

Boost clock speed 2903 MHz
Compute units 28
Core clock speed 2200 MHz 930 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 7 nm 28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 650.3 GFLOPS (1:16)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 20.81 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 10.40 TFLOPS
Pipelines 1792 2816
Pixel fill rate 185.8 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 325.1 GTexel/s 163.7 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 80 Watt 750 Watt
Transistor count 11060 million 6,200 million
Floating-point performance 5,238 gflops

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x S-Video
Dual-link DVI support
HD сomponent video output
StereoOutput3D

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Form factor IGP Full Height / Full Length
Interface PCIe 4.0 x8 PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Bus support PCIe 3.0
Length 275 mm

API support

DirectX 12.1 12.0 (12_0)
OpenCL 2.1
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Shader Model 6.5
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 16 GB
Memory bandwidth 224 GB/s 320 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 bit 512 Bit
Memory clock speed 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) 5000 MHz
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR5