AMD Radeon Pro W6600M vs AMD Radeon RX 5700
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W6600M and AMD Radeon RX 5700 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 50% higher core clock speed: 2200 MHz vs 1465 MHz
- Around 68% higher boost clock speed: 2903 MHz vs 1725 MHz
- 1308.8x more texture fill rate: 325.1 GTexel/s vs 248.4 GT/s
- 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 180 Watt
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 15257 vs 11536
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 15257 vs 11536
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 8 Jun 2021 vs 7 July 2019 |
Core clock speed | 2200 MHz vs 1465 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2903 MHz vs 1725 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 325.1 GTexel/s vs 248.4 GT/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 180 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15257 vs 11536 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15257 vs 11536 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5700
- Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 883 vs 797
- Around 52% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 14431 vs 9522
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3723 vs 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3723 vs 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3366 vs 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3366 vs 3358 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 883 vs 797 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14431 vs 9522 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W6600M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 5700
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro W6600M | AMD Radeon RX 5700 |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15257 | 11536 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15257 | 11536 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | 3723 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | 3723 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3366 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3366 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 797 | 883 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9522 | 14431 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 65868 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 209.509 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3686.851 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.941 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 250 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1036.448 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8497 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro W6600M | AMD Radeon RX 5700 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | RDNA |
Code name | Navi 23 | Navi 10 |
Launch date | 8 Jun 2021 | 7 July 2019 |
Place in performance rating | 187 | 189 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $350 | |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2903 MHz | 1725 MHz |
Compute units | 28 | 36 |
Core clock speed | 2200 MHz | 1465 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 650.3 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 20.81 TFLOPS (2:1) | 15.9 TFLOPs |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 10.40 TFLOPS | 7.95 TFLOPs |
Pipelines | 1792 | |
Pixel fill rate | 185.8 GPixel/s | 110.4 GP/s |
Texture fill rate | 325.1 GTexel/s | 248.4 GT/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 180 Watt |
Transistor count | 11060 million | 10.3 B |
Render output units | 64 | |
Stream Processors | 2304 | |
Texture Units | 144 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
DisplayPort support | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1 x 8-pin and 1x6 pin |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
VR Ready |