AMD Radeon Pro W6600M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W6600M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 44% higher core clock speed: 2200 MHz vs 1530 MHz
- Around 68% higher boost clock speed: 2903 MHz vs 1725 MHz
- 2.4x more texture fill rate: 325.1 GTexel/s vs 138.0 GTexel/s
- Around 40% higher pipelines: 1792 vs 1280
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 25% lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 100 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 15257 vs 13569
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 15257 vs 13569
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 8 Jun 2021 vs 22 Nov 2019 |
| Core clock speed | 2200 MHz vs 1530 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2903 MHz vs 1725 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 325.1 GTexel/s vs 138.0 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 1792 vs 1280 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 12 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 100 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15257 vs 13569 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15257 vs 13569 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 vs 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 vs 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3357 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W6600M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro W6600M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15257 | 13569 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15257 | 13569 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3357 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 10144 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 753 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 55409 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 178.926 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1940.024 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 11.167 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 102.69 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 802.026 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4670 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro W6600M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Turing |
| Code name | Navi 23 | TU116 |
| Launch date | 8 Jun 2021 | 22 Nov 2019 |
| Place in performance rating | 270 | 269 |
| Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 2903 MHz | 1725 MHz |
| Compute units | 28 | |
| Core clock speed | 2200 MHz | 1530 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 650.3 GFLOPS (1:16) | 138.0 GFLOPS (1:32) |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 20.81 TFLOPS (2:1) | 8.832 TFLOPS (2:1) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 10.40 TFLOPS | 4.416 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 1792 | 1280 |
| Pixel fill rate | 185.8 GPixel/s | 55.20 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 325.1 GTexel/s | 138.0 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Transistor count | 11060 million | 6600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1xDVI, 1xHDMI, 1xDisplayPort |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | IGP | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 9 inches (229 mm) | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
| Width | Dual-slot | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.4 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 192 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro W6600M with others
AMDRadeon Pro W6600M vs
AMDRadeon R9 M485X
AMDRadeon Pro W6600M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
AMDRadeon Pro W6600M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Ti
AMDRadeon Pro W6600M vs
AMDRadeon Pro 5600M
AMDRadeon Pro W6600M vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 Ti
AMDRadeon Pro W6600M vs
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile
