AMD Radeon Pro W6600M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W6600M and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M
- 3x more core clock speed: 2200 MHz vs 735 MHz
- 2.8x more boost clock speed: 2903 MHz vs 1035 MHz
- 3.9x more texture fill rate: 325.1 GTexel/s vs 82.80 GTexel/s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 8 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 17% higher memory clock speed: 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective
| Core clock speed | 2200 MHz vs 735 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2903 MHz vs 1035 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 325.1 GTexel/s vs 82.80 GTexel/s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 8 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti
- Around 43% higher pipelines: 2560 vs 1792
- Around 7% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 80 Watt
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16098 vs 15257
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16098 vs 15257
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 2560 vs 1792 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 80 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16098 vs 15257 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16098 vs 15257 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3716 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W6600M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro W6600M | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15257 | 16098 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15257 | 16098 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3358 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 10167 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 497 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 57386 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 200.776 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1938.08 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 15.298 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 108.443 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 568.183 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5393 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro W6600M | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Ampere |
| Code name | Navi 23 | GA106 |
| Launch date | 8 Jun 2021 | 11 May 2021 |
| Place in performance rating | 270 | 268 |
| Type | Laptop | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 2903 MHz | 1035 MHz |
| Compute units | 28 | |
| Core clock speed | 2200 MHz | 735 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 8 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 650.3 GFLOPS (1:16) | 82.80 GFLOPS (1:64) |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 20.81 TFLOPS (2:1) | 5.299 TFLOPS (1:1) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 10.40 TFLOPS | 5.299 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 1792 | 2560 |
| Pixel fill rate | 185.8 GPixel/s | 49.68 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 325.1 GTexel/s | 82.80 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Transistor count | 11060 million | 12000 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | Portable Device Dependent |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | IGP | IGP |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.7 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 192.0 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro W6600M with others
AMDRadeon Pro W6600M vs
AMDRadeon R9 M485X
AMDRadeon Pro W6600M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
AMDRadeon Pro W6600M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Ti
AMDRadeon Pro W6600M vs
AMDRadeon Pro 5600M
AMDRadeon Pro W6600M vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 Ti
AMDRadeon Pro W6600M vs
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile
