NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile vs AMD Radeon Pro W6600M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile and AMD Radeon Pro W6600M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile
- Around 43% higher pipelines: 2560 vs 1792
| Pipelines | 2560 vs 1792 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M
- 3x more core clock speed: 2200 MHz vs 735 MHz
- Around 60% higher boost clock speed: 2903 MHz vs 1815 MHz
- 2.2x more texture fill rate: 325.1 GTexel/s vs 145.2 GTexel/s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 8 nm
- Around 19% lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 95 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 17% higher memory clock speed: 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) vs 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective)
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 15257 vs 12750
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 15257 vs 12750
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 2200 MHz vs 735 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2903 MHz vs 1815 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 325.1 GTexel/s vs 145.2 GTexel/s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 8 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 95 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) vs 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15257 vs 12750 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 vs 3708 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15257 vs 12750 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 vs 3708 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3355 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro W6600M
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile | AMD Radeon Pro W6600M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9962 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 476 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 56966 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 202.984 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2138.158 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.498 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 151.433 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 729.947 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12750 | 15257 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 | 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12750 | 15257 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 | 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3358 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile | AMD Radeon Pro W6600M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 2.0 |
| Code name | GA106 | Navi 23 |
| Place in performance rating | 267 | 270 |
| Launch date | 8 Jun 2021 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1815 MHz | 2903 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 735 MHz | 2200 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 7 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 145.2 GFLOPS (1:64) | 650.3 GFLOPS (1:16) |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 9.293 TFLOPS (1:1) | 20.81 TFLOPS (2:1) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 9.293 TFLOPS | 10.40 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 2560 | 1792 |
| Pixel fill rate | 87.12 GPixel/s | 185.8 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 145.2 GTexel/s | 325.1 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt | 80 Watt |
| Transistor count | 13250 million | 11060 million |
| Compute units | 28 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Form factor | IGP | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 192 GB/s | 224 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile with others
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon HD 6610M
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAQuadro P3200 Max-Q
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 Ti
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon Pro W6600M
