AMD Radeon Pro W6600M vs AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W6600M and AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 month(s) later
- Around 77% higher core clock speed: 2200 MHz vs 1243 MHz
- Around 94% higher boost clock speed: 2903 MHz vs 1499 MHz
- Around 36% higher texture fill rate: 325.1 GTexel/s vs 239.8 GTexel/s
- Around 63% lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 130 Watt
- Around 17% higher memory clock speed: 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 820 vs 812
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 8 Jun 2021 vs 4 Aug 2020 |
| Core clock speed | 2200 MHz vs 1243 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2903 MHz vs 1499 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 325.1 GTexel/s vs 239.8 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 130 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 vs 3712 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 vs 3712 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3353 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 820 vs 812 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT
- Around 43% higher pipelines: 2560 vs 1792
- 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16433 vs 15257
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16433 vs 15257
- Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12568 vs 10526
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 2560 vs 1792 |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 8 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16433 vs 15257 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16433 vs 15257 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12568 vs 10526 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W6600M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro W6600M | AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15257 | 16433 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15257 | 16433 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | 3712 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | 3712 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3353 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 820 | 812 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 10526 | 12568 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 59915 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro W6600M | AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | RDNA 1.0 |
| Code name | Navi 23 | Navi 10 |
| Launch date | 8 Jun 2021 | 4 Aug 2020 |
| Place in performance rating | 184 | 181 |
| Type | Laptop | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 2903 MHz | 1499 MHz |
| Compute units | 28 | 40 |
| Core clock speed | 2200 MHz | 1243 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 7 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 650.3 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 20.81 TFLOPS (2:1) | 15.35 TFLOPS (2:1) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 10.40 TFLOPS | 7.675 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 1792 | 2560 |
| Pixel fill rate | 185.8 GPixel/s | 95.94 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 325.1 GTexel/s | 239.8 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 130 Watt |
| Transistor count | 11060 million | 10300 million |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 479.7 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | IGP | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
| Width | IGP | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 384 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro W6600M with others
AMDRadeon Pro W6600M vs
AMDRadeon R9 295X2
AMDRadeon Pro W6600M vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Mobile
AMDRadeon Pro W6600M vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
AMDRadeon Pro W6600M vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Mobile
AMDRadeon Pro W6600M vs
AMDRadeon Pro 5700 XT
AMDRadeon Pro W6600M vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 OEM
