AMD Radeon Pro W6800 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W6800 and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W6800
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 28% higher core clock speed: 2075 MHz vs 1620 MHz
- Around 38% higher boost clock speed: 2507 MHz vs 1815 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 31% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 921 vs 705
- Around 27% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19952 vs 15652
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20988 vs 19811
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20988 vs 19811
- Around 25% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 131707 vs 105171
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 8 Jun 2021 vs 13 August 2018 |
| Core clock speed | 2075 MHz vs 1620 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2507 MHz vs 1815 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 12 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 921 vs 705 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 19952 vs 15652 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20988 vs 19811 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20988 vs 19811 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 131707 vs 105171 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000
- 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 200 Watt vs 450 Watt
- 7x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective)
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt vs 450 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 vs 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 vs 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3357 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W6800
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro W6800 | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 921 | 705 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 19952 | 15652 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20988 | 19811 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20988 | 19811 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3719 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3719 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3358 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 131707 | 105171 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 270.203 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3728.248 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 26.999 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 110.761 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1370.281 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10685 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro W6800 | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Turing |
| Code name | Navi 21 | TU104 |
| Launch date | 8 Jun 2021 | 13 August 2018 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $2249 | $2,299 |
| Place in performance rating | 113 | 138 |
| Type | Workstation | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 2507 MHz | 1815 MHz |
| Compute units | 60 | |
| Core clock speed | 2075 MHz | 1620 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 1203 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 38.51 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 19.25 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 3840 | |
| Pixel fill rate | 240.7 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 601.7 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 450 Watt | 200 Watt |
| Transistor count | 26800 million | 13,600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 6x mini-DisplayPort | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | Dual-slot | |
| Height | 50 mm (2 inches) | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | 267 mm |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 850 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Width | 120 mm (4.7 inches) | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 512 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 14000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro W6800 with others
AMDRadeon Pro W6800 vs
NVIDIATesla T10 Processor
AMDRadeon Pro W6800 vs
NVIDIAQuadro P4000 Max-Q
AMDRadeon Pro W6800 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
AMDRadeon Pro W6800 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Super
AMDRadeon Pro W6800 vs
NVIDIARTX A2000 12 GB
AMDRadeon Pro W6800 vs
AppleM2 Ultra 60-core
