AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo vs AMD Radeon Pro 575
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo and AMD Radeon Pro 575 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 64% higher core clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1096 MHz
- 3366.5x more texture fill rate: 474.0 GTexel/s vs 140.8 GTexel / s
- Around 88% higher pipelines: 3840 vs 2048
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 14 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 4 GB
- 3.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 125290 vs 34797
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 3 Aug 2021 vs 5 June 2017 |
| Core clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 1096 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 474.0 GTexel/s vs 140.8 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 3840 vs 2048 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 14 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 4 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 125290 vs 34797 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 575
- 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 120 Watt vs 400 Watt
- 3.4x more memory clock speed: 6800 MHz vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective)
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2814 vs 2786
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2814 vs 2786
- Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3352 vs 2243
- Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3352 vs 2243
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt vs 400 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 6800 MHz vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2814 vs 2786 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2814 vs 2786 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 vs 2243 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 vs 2243 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro 575
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo | AMD Radeon Pro 575 |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2786 | 2814 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2786 | 2814 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2243 | 3352 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2243 | 3352 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 125290 | 34797 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 86.154 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1090.128 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.88 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 98.349 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 539.686 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9613 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9613 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo | AMD Radeon Pro 575 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Code name | Navi 21 | Polaris 20 |
| Launch date | 3 Aug 2021 | 5 June 2017 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $4999 | |
| Place in performance rating | 495 | 496 |
| Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1975 MHz | |
| Compute units | 60 | |
| Core clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1096 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 948.0 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 30.34 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 15.17 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 3840 | 2048 |
| Pixel fill rate | 189.6 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 474.0 GTexel/s | 140.8 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 400 Watt | 120 Watt |
| Transistor count | 26800 million | 5,700 million |
| Floating-point performance | 4,506 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 4x Thunderbolt | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | 241 mm |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 800 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Width | Quad-slot | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (12_0) |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 512 GB/s | 217.6 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 6800 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo with others
AMDRadeon Pro W6800X Duo vs
ATIRadeon X850 XT
AMDRadeon Pro W6800X Duo vs
ATIFireGL V3300
AMDRadeon Pro W6800X Duo vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 565v
AMDRadeon Pro W6800X Duo vs
AMDRadeon R9 M295X
AMDRadeon Pro W6800X Duo vs
AMDRadeon R9 Nano
AMDRadeon Pro W6800X Duo vs
AMDRadeon Pro 575
