AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo vs NVIDIA Quadro P1000
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo and NVIDIA Quadro P1000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 42% higher core clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1266 MHz
- Around 33% higher boost clock speed: 1975 MHz vs 1480 MHz
- 8006.8x more texture fill rate: 474.0 GTexel/s vs 59.2 GTexel / s
- 7.5x more pipelines: 3840 vs 512
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 14 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 4 GB
- 7.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 113306 vs 15667
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 3 Aug 2021 vs 7 February 2017 |
| Core clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 1266 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1975 MHz vs 1480 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 474.0 GTexel/s vs 59.2 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 3840 vs 512 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 14 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 4 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 113306 vs 15667 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P1000
- 8.5x lower typical power consumption: 47 Watt vs 400 Watt
- 2.5x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective)
- Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3702 vs 2786
- Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3702 vs 2786
- Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3348 vs 2243
- Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3348 vs 2243
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 47 Watt vs 400 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3702 vs 2786 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3702 vs 2786 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3348 vs 2243 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3348 vs 2243 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P1000
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo | NVIDIA Quadro P1000 |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2786 | 3702 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2786 | 3702 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2243 | 3348 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2243 | 3348 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 113306 | 15667 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4454 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 595 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 71.86 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 832.248 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.039 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 65.117 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 245.081 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6796 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6796 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1591 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo | NVIDIA Quadro P1000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Pascal |
| Code name | Navi 21 | GP107 |
| Launch date | 3 Aug 2021 | 7 February 2017 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $4999 | $375 |
| Place in performance rating | 528 | 530 |
| Type | Workstation | Workstation |
| Price now | $319.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 15.53 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1975 MHz | 1480 MHz |
| Compute units | 60 | |
| Core clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1266 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 948.0 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 30.34 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 15.17 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 3840 | 512 |
| Pixel fill rate | 189.6 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 474.0 GTexel/s | 59.2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 400 Watt | 47 Watt |
| Transistor count | 26800 million | 3,300 million |
| Floating-point performance | 1,894 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 4x Thunderbolt | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | 145 mm |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 800 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Width | Quad-slot | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 512 GB/s | 80.19 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 5012 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo with others
AMDRadeon Pro W6800X Duo vs
AMDFirePro M6000
AMDRadeon Pro W6800X Duo vs
NVIDIATesla K40c
AMDRadeon Pro W6800X Duo vs
NVIDIAQuadro P1000
AMDRadeon Pro W6800X Duo vs
AMDRadeon RX 560
AMDRadeon Pro W6800X Duo vs
IntelIris Xe Graphics MAX
AMDRadeon Pro W6800X Duo vs
NVIDIARTX A500 Mobile
