AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs AMD FirePro V7900
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 and AMD FirePro V7900 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 28% higher core clock speed: 925 MHz vs 725 MHz
- 596.9x more texture fill rate: 34.62 GTexel/s vs 58.0 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 151 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2415 vs 2305
- Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 415 vs 336
- Around 83% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 25.896 vs 14.134
- Around 91% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.503 vs 1.309
- Around 45% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 53.111 vs 36.678
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 24 May 2011 |
Core clock speed | 925 MHz vs 725 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 34.62 GTexel/s vs 58.0 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 151 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2415 vs 2305 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 415 vs 336 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.896 vs 14.134 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.503 vs 1.309 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 53.111 vs 36.678 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro V7900
- Around 25% higher memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 4000 MHz
- Around 96% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 27733 vs 14144
- Around 39% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 676.409 vs 486.804
- Around 70% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 171.25 vs 100.658
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2996 vs 2524
- Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3710 vs 3274
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2996 vs 2524
- Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3710 vs 3274
Specifications (specs) | |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz vs 4000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 27733 vs 14144 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 676.409 vs 486.804 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 171.25 vs 100.658 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2996 vs 2524 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 vs 3274 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 vs 3352 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2996 vs 2524 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 vs 3274 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 vs 3352 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
GPU 2: AMD FirePro V7900
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 | AMD FirePro V7900 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2415 | 2305 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 415 | 336 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 14144 | 27733 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.896 | 14.134 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 486.804 | 676.409 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.503 | 1.309 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 53.111 | 36.678 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 100.658 | 171.25 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2524 | 2996 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3274 | 3710 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 | 3354 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2524 | 2996 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3274 | 3710 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 | 3354 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 | AMD FirePro V7900 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Polaris | TeraScale 3 |
Code name | Lexa | Cayman |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 24 May 2011 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $199 | |
Place in performance rating | 855 | 852 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1082 MHz | |
Compute units | 10 | |
Core clock speed | 925 MHz | 725 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 86.56 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1,385 GFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1,385 GFLOPS | |
Pixel fill rate | 17.31 GPixel/s | |
Stream Processors | 640 | |
Texture fill rate | 34.62 GTexel/s | 58.0 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 151 Watt |
Transistor count | 2200 million | 2,640 million |
Floating-point performance | 1,856.0 gflops | |
Pipelines | 1280 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort | 4x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort count | 4 | |
Dual-link DVI support | ||
StereoOutput3D | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Height | Half Height | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 6.6" (168 mm) | 279 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
Bus support | PCIe 2.1 x16 | |
Form factor | Full Height / Full Length | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 96 GB/s | 160 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) |