AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 and Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- 3.1x more core clock speed: 925 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 53% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2415 vs 1576
- Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 415 vs 371
- Around 99% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 14144 vs 7095
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3274 vs 1564
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3274 vs 1564
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 3 January 2017 |
| Core clock speed | 925 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2415 vs 1576 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 415 vs 371 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 14144 vs 7095 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3274 vs 1564 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 vs 3340 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3274 vs 1564 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 vs 3340 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
- Around 6% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 1082 MHz
- 4.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 65 Watt
- 8x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2652 vs 2524
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2652 vs 2524
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz vs 1082 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 65 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 4 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2652 vs 2524 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2652 vs 2524 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
GPU 2: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2415 | 1576 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 415 | 371 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 14144 | 7095 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.896 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 486.804 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.503 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 53.111 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 100.658 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2524 | 2652 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3274 | 1564 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 | 3340 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2524 | 2652 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3274 | 1564 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 | 3340 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Polaris | Generation 9.5 |
| Code name | Lexa | Kaby Lake GT3e |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 3 January 2017 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $199 | |
| Place in performance rating | 855 | 857 |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1082 MHz | 1150 MHz |
| Compute units | 10 | |
| Core clock speed | 925 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 86.56 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1,385 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1,385 GFLOPS | |
| Pixel fill rate | 17.31 GPixel/s | |
| Stream Processors | 640 | |
| Texture fill rate | 34.62 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Transistor count | 2200 million | 189 million |
| Floating-point performance | 883 gflops | |
| Pipelines | 48 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Height | Half Height | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
| Length | 6.6" (168 mm) | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 32 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 96 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 |
| Shared memory | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| Quick Sync | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 with others
AMDRadeon Pro WX 3200 vs
ATIMobility Radeon X1450
AMDRadeon Pro WX 3200 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 5850
AMDRadeon Pro WX 3200 vs
AMDFirePro V7900
AMDRadeon Pro WX 3200 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 810A
AMDRadeon Pro WX 3200 vs
IntelIris Plus Graphics 650
AMDRadeon Pro WX 3200 vs
AMDRadeon R9 M390
