AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs AMD Radeon R9 M390

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 and AMD Radeon R9 M390 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200

AMD Radeon R9 M390

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200

Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 11 month(s) later
2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3274 vs 1232
2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3274 vs 1232

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	27 May 2019 vs 09 June 2015
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3274 vs 1232
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3352 vs 3351
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3274 vs 1232
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3352 vs 3351

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M390

Around 44% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 20286 vs 14118
Around 71% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 44.394 vs 25.896
Around 81% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 881.959 vs 486.804
Around 61% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.028 vs 2.503
Around 39% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 73.782 vs 53.111
2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 241.868 vs 100.658
2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6227 vs 2524
2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6227 vs 2524

Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	20286 vs 14118
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	44.394 vs 25.896
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	881.959 vs 486.804
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	4.028 vs 2.503
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	73.782 vs 53.111
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	241.868 vs 100.658
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	6227 vs 2524
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	6227 vs 2524

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M390

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

14118

20286

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

25.896

44.394

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

486.804

881.959

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2.503

4.028

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

53.111

73.782

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

100.658

241.868

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2524

6227

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3274

1232

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3352

3351

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2524

6227

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3274

1232

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3352

3351

Name	AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200	AMD Radeon R9 M390
PassMark - G3D Mark	2415
PassMark - G2D Mark	415
Geekbench - OpenCL	14118	20286
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	25.896	44.394
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	486.804	881.959
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	2.503	4.028
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	53.111	73.782
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	100.658	241.868
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2524	6227
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3274	1232
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3352	3351
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2524	6227
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3274	1232
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3352	3351

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200	AMD Radeon R9 M390
Essentials
Architecture	Polaris	GCN
Code name	Lexa	Pitcairn
Launch date	27 May 2019	09 June 2015
Launch price (MSRP)	$199
Place in performance rating	855	856
Type	Workstation
Design		AMD Radeon R9 300 Series
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1082 MHz
Compute units	10
Core clock speed	925 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	86.56 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	1,385 GFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	1,385 GFLOPS
Pixel fill rate	17.31 GPixel/s
Stream Processors	640
Texture fill rate	34.62 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	65 Watt
Transistor count	2200 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	4x mini-DisplayPort
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Height	Half Height
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8
Length	6.6" (168 mm)
Supplementary power connectors	None
API support
DirectX	12.0	12
OpenCL	2.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.4
Shader Model	6.4
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	4 GB
Memory bandwidth	96 GB/s
Memory bus width	128 bit	256 bit
Memory clock speed	4000 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Technologies
AMD Eyefinity
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)
Video Code Engine (VCE)
DualGraphics
PowerTune
Switchable graphics
ZeroCore