AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs AMD Radeon R9 M390
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 and AMD Radeon R9 M390 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3274 vs 1232
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3274 vs 1232
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 09 June 2015 |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3274 vs 1232 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 vs 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3274 vs 1232 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 vs 3351 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M390
- Around 43% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 20286 vs 14144
- Around 71% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 44.394 vs 25.896
- Around 81% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 881.959 vs 486.804
- Around 61% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.028 vs 2.503
- Around 39% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 73.782 vs 53.111
- 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 241.868 vs 100.658
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6227 vs 2524
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6227 vs 2524
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 20286 vs 14144 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 44.394 vs 25.896 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 881.959 vs 486.804 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.028 vs 2.503 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 73.782 vs 53.111 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 241.868 vs 100.658 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6227 vs 2524 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6227 vs 2524 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M390
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 | AMD Radeon R9 M390 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2415 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 415 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 14144 | 20286 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.896 | 44.394 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 486.804 | 881.959 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.503 | 4.028 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 53.111 | 73.782 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 100.658 | 241.868 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2524 | 6227 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3274 | 1232 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 | 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2524 | 6227 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3274 | 1232 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 | 3351 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 | AMD Radeon R9 M390 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Polaris | GCN |
Code name | Lexa | Pitcairn |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 09 June 2015 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $199 | |
Place in performance rating | 855 | 856 |
Type | Workstation | |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1082 MHz | |
Compute units | 10 | |
Core clock speed | 925 MHz | |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 86.56 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1,385 GFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1,385 GFLOPS | |
Pixel fill rate | 17.31 GPixel/s | |
Stream Processors | 640 | |
Texture fill rate | 34.62 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | |
Transistor count | 2200 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Height | Half Height | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
Length | 6.6" (168 mm) | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 12 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 96 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
DualGraphics | ||
PowerTune | ||
Switchable graphics | ||
ZeroCore |