AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5850
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5850 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 85% higher core clock speed: 925 MHz vs 500 MHz
- 1731x more texture fill rate: 34.62 GTexel/s vs 20 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
- 3.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2415 vs 763
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 415 vs 403
- 3.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 25.896 vs 7.457
- Around 54% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2524 vs 1643
- Around 54% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2524 vs 1643
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 7 January 2010 |
Core clock speed | 925 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 34.62 GTexel/s vs 20 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2415 vs 763 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 415 vs 403 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.896 vs 7.457 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2524 vs 1643 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2524 vs 1643 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5850
- 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 65 Watt
- Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 512.081 vs 486.804
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3314 vs 3274
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3314 vs 3274
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 65 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 512.081 vs 486.804 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3314 vs 3274 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 3352 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3314 vs 3274 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 3352 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5850
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5850 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2415 | 763 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 415 | 403 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 14118 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.896 | 7.457 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 486.804 | 512.081 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.503 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 53.111 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 100.658 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2524 | 1643 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3274 | 3314 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 | 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2524 | 1643 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3274 | 3314 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 | 3356 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5850 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Polaris | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | Lexa | Broadway |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 7 January 2010 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $199 | |
Place in performance rating | 855 | 853 |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1082 MHz | |
Compute units | 10 | |
Core clock speed | 925 MHz | 500 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 86.56 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1,385 GFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1,385 GFLOPS | |
Pixel fill rate | 17.31 GPixel/s | |
Stream Processors | 640 | |
Texture fill rate | 34.62 GTexel/s | 20 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 30 Watt |
Transistor count | 2200 million | 1,040 million |
Floating-point performance | 800.0 gflops | |
Pipelines | 800 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Height | Half Height | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 6.6" (168 mm) | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 96 GB/s | 64.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 4000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3, GDDR3, GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
HDMI 1.3a |