AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs AMD Radeon RX 550
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 and AMD Radeon RX 550 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- 914.4x more texture fill rate: 34.62 GTexel/s vs 37.86 GTexel / s
- Around 22% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 14219 vs 11610
- Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 53.111 vs 52.533
- 3.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3274 vs 940
- Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3352 vs 2158
- 3.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3274 vs 940
- Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3352 vs 2158
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 18 April 2017 |
Texture fill rate | 34.62 GTexel/s vs 37.86 GTexel / s |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 14219 vs 11610 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 53.111 vs 52.533 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3274 vs 940 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 vs 2158 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3274 vs 940 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 vs 2158 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 550
- Around 19% higher core clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 925 MHz
- Around 9% higher boost clock speed: 1183 MHz vs 1082 MHz
- Around 30% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 65 Watt
- Around 75% higher memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 4000 MHz
- Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2690 vs 2398
- Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 476 vs 411
- Around 29% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 33.507 vs 25.896
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1037.305 vs 486.804
- Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.064 vs 2.503
- Around 40% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 140.911 vs 100.658
- Around 78% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4485 vs 2524
- Around 78% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4485 vs 2524
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1100 MHz vs 925 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1183 MHz vs 1082 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 65 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz vs 4000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2690 vs 2398 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 476 vs 411 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 33.507 vs 25.896 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1037.305 vs 486.804 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.064 vs 2.503 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 140.911 vs 100.658 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4485 vs 2524 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4485 vs 2524 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 550
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 | AMD Radeon RX 550 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2398 | 2690 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 411 | 476 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 14219 | 11610 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.896 | 33.507 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 486.804 | 1037.305 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.503 | 3.064 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 53.111 | 52.533 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 100.658 | 140.911 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2524 | 4485 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3274 | 940 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 | 2158 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2524 | 4485 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3274 | 940 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 | 2158 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 127 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 | AMD Radeon RX 550 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Polaris | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | Lexa | Lexa |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 18 April 2017 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $199 | $79 |
Place in performance rating | 841 | 876 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Design | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
Price now | $75 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 59.51 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1082 MHz | 1183 MHz |
Compute units | 10 | |
Core clock speed | 925 MHz | 1100 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 86.56 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1,385 GFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1,385 GFLOPS | |
Pixel fill rate | 17.31 GPixel/s | |
Stream Processors | 640 | |
Texture fill rate | 34.62 GTexel/s | 37.86 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 50 Watt |
Transistor count | 2200 million | 2,200 million |
Floating-point performance | 1.2 TFLOPs | |
Pipelines | 512 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Height | Half Height | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Length | 6.6" (168 mm) | 145 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 400 Watt | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 12 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 96 GB/s | 112 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 7000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) |