AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop)

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
• Around 44% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 14219 vs 9864
• 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 486.804 vs 170.785
• Around 82% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.503 vs 1.373
• 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 53.111 vs 18.937
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3352 vs 3331
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3352 vs 3331

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop)

• Around 33% higher core clock speed: 1228 MHz vs 925 MHz
• Around 54% higher boost clock speed: 1670 MHz vs 1082 MHz
• 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 65 Watt
• Around 50% higher memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 4000 MHz
• Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2433 vs 2398
• Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 442 vs 411
• Around 42% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 36.898 vs 25.896
• Around 60% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 160.823 vs 100.658
• Around 44% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3629 vs 2524
• Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3684 vs 3274
• Around 44% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3629 vs 2524
• Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3684 vs 3274

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop)

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2398 2433
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	411 442
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	14219 9864
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	25.896 36.898
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	486.804 170.785
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.503 1.373
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	53.111 18.937
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	100.658 160.823
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2524 3629
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3274 3684
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3352 3331
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2524 3629
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3274 3684
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3352 3331

Compare specifications (specs)