AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200

• Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 5 month(s) later
• Around 26% higher core clock speed: 925 MHz vs 732 MHz
• 788.3x more texture fill rate: 34.62 GTexel/s vs 43.92 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
• 3.4x lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 219 Watt
• 3.2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1280 MB
• Around 5% higher memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 3800 MHz
• Around 47% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 53.111 vs 36.208

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2

• Around 41% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 36.499 vs 25.896
• Around 38% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 674.215 vs 486.804
• Around 58% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.967 vs 2.503
• Around 23% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 123.354 vs 100.658
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5405 vs 2524
• Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3705 vs 3274
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5405 vs 2524
• Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3705 vs 3274

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	25.896 36.499
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	486.804 674.215
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.503 3.967
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	53.111 36.208
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	100.658 123.354
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2524 5405
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3274 3705
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3352 3357
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2524 5405
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3274 3705
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3352 3357

Compare specifications (specs)