AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 8 ans 5 mois plus tard
- Environ 26% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 925 MHz versus 732 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 34.62 GTexel/s versus 43.92 GTexel / s
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 40 nm
- 3.4x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 65 Watt versus 219 Watt
- 3.2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 1280 MB
- Environ 5% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 4000 MHz versus 3800 MHz
- Environ 47% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 53.111 versus 36.208
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 27 May 2019 versus 7 December 2010 |
Vitesse du noyau | 925 MHz versus 732 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 34.62 GTexel/s versus 43.92 GTexel / s |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt versus 219 Watt |
Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 1280 MB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 4000 MHz versus 3800 MHz |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 53.111 versus 36.208 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 36.499 versus 25.896
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 674.215 versus 486.804
- Environ 58% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.967 versus 2.503
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 123.354 versus 100.658
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5405 versus 2524
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3705 versus 3274
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5405 versus 2524
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3705 versus 3274
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 36.499 versus 25.896 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 674.215 versus 486.804 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.967 versus 2.503 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 123.354 versus 100.658 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5405 versus 2524 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3705 versus 3274 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 versus 3352 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5405 versus 2524 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3705 versus 3274 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 versus 3352 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2428 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 439 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 14535 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.896 | 36.499 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 486.804 | 674.215 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.503 | 3.967 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 53.111 | 36.208 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 100.658 | 123.354 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2524 | 5405 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3274 | 3705 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 | 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2524 | 5405 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3274 | 3705 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 | 3357 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Polaris | Fermi 2.0 |
Nom de code | Lexa | GF110 |
Date de sortie | 27 May 2019 | 7 December 2010 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $199 | $349 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 813 | 808 |
Genre | Workstation | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1082 MHz | |
Unités de Compute | 10 | |
Vitesse du noyau | 925 MHz | 732 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 86.56 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1,385 GFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1,385 GFLOPS | |
Pixel fill rate | 17.31 GPixel/s | |
Stream Processors | 640 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 34.62 GTexel/s | 43.92 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 219 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 2200 million | 3,000 million |
Performance á point flottant | 1,405 gflops | |
Pipelines | 480 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 4x mini-DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Hauteur | Half Height | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Longeur | 6.6" (168 mm) | 267 mm |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 2x 6-pin |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 4 GB | 1280 MB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 96 GB/s | 152.0 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | 320 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 4000 MHz | 3800 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) |