AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 and AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- 887.5x more texture fill rate: 34.62 GTexel/s vs 39.01 GTexel / s
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 33% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2428 vs 1832
- Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 444 vs 402
- Around 42% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 14535 vs 10216
- Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 486.804 vs 438.581
- Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.503 vs 2.268
- Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 53.111 vs 46.988
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 12 June 2017 |
Texture fill rate | 34.62 GTexel/s vs 39.01 GTexel / s |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2428 vs 1832 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 444 vs 402 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 14535 vs 10216 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 486.804 vs 438.581 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.503 vs 2.268 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 53.111 vs 46.988 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 vs 3350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 vs 3350 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100
- Around 13% higher boost clock speed: 1219 MHz vs 1082 MHz
- Around 75% higher memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 4000 MHz
- Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 30.848 vs 25.896
- Around 38% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 139.235 vs 100.658
- Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3241 vs 2524
- Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3709 vs 3274
- Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3241 vs 2524
- Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3709 vs 3274
Specifications (specs) | |
Boost clock speed | 1219 MHz vs 1082 MHz |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz vs 4000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 30.848 vs 25.896 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 139.235 vs 100.658 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3241 vs 2524 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3709 vs 3274 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3241 vs 2524 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3709 vs 3274 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
GPU 2: AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 | AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2428 | 1832 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 444 | 402 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 14535 | 10216 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.896 | 30.848 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 486.804 | 438.581 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.503 | 2.268 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 53.111 | 46.988 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 100.658 | 139.235 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2524 | 3241 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3274 | 3709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 | 3350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2524 | 3241 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3274 | 3709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 | 3350 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 | AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Polaris | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | Lexa | Lexa |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 12 June 2017 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $199 | $149 |
Place in performance rating | 813 | 804 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1082 MHz | 1219 MHz |
Compute units | 10 | |
Core clock speed | 925 MHz | 925 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 86.56 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1,385 GFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1,385 GFLOPS | |
Pixel fill rate | 17.31 GPixel/s | |
Stream Processors | 640 | |
Texture fill rate | 34.62 GTexel/s | 39.01 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 65 Watt |
Transistor count | 2200 million | 2,200 million |
Floating-point performance | 1,248 gflops | |
Pipelines | 512 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort | 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Height | Half Height | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Length | 6.6" (168 mm) | 145 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 96 GB/s | 56 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 7000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) |