AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200

Around 23% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 80 Watt

Thermal Design Power (TDP)	65 Watt vs 80 Watt

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000

Around 2% higher core clock speed: 945 MHz vs 925 MHz
Around 28% higher boost clock speed: 1380 MHz vs 1082 MHz
5.7x more texture fill rate: 198.7 GTexel/s vs 34.62 GTexel/s
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
3.5x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 4000 MHz
4.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 10967 vs 2398
Around 21% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 498 vs 411
4.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 63532 vs 14219
5.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14496 vs 2524
Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3719 vs 3274
5.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14496 vs 2524
Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3719 vs 3274

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	945 MHz vs 925 MHz
Boost clock speed	1380 MHz vs 1082 MHz
Texture fill rate	198.7 GTexel/s vs 34.62 GTexel/s
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm vs 14 nm
Maximum memory size	6 GB vs 4 GB
Memory clock speed	14000 MHz vs 4000 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	10967 vs 2398
PassMark - G2D Mark	498 vs 411
Geekbench - OpenCL	63532 vs 14219
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	14496 vs 2524
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3719 vs 3274
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3361 vs 3352
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	14496 vs 2524
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3719 vs 3274
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3361 vs 3352

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

2398

10967

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

411

498

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

14219

63532

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2524

14496

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3274

3719

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3352

3361

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2524

14496

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3274

3719

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3352

3361

Name	AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200	NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000
PassMark - G3D Mark	2398	10967
PassMark - G2D Mark	411	498
Geekbench - OpenCL	14219	63532
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	25.896
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	486.804
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	2.503
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	53.111
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	100.658
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2524	14496
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3274	3719
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3352	3361
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2524	14496
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3274	3719
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3352	3361

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200	NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000
Essentials
Architecture	Polaris	Turing
Code name	Lexa	N19E-Q1
Launch date	27 May 2019	27 May 2019
Launch price (MSRP)	$199
Place in performance rating	841	249
Type	Workstation	Mobile workstation
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1082 MHz	1380 MHz
Compute units	10
Core clock speed	925 MHz	945 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	12 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	86.56 GFLOPS	198.7 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	1,385 GFLOPS	12.72 TFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	1,385 GFLOPS	6.359 TFLOPS
Pixel fill rate	17.31 GPixel/s	88.32 GPixel/s
Stream Processors	640
Texture fill rate	34.62 GTexel/s	198.7 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	65 Watt	80 Watt
Transistor count	2200 million	10800 million
Pipelines		2304
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	4x mini-DisplayPort	No outputs
G-SYNC support
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Height	Half Height
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	6.6" (168 mm)
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Laptop size		Large
API support
DirectX	12.0	12.1
OpenCL	2.0	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Shader Model	6.4	6.4
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	6 GB
Memory bandwidth	96 GB/s	448 GB/s
Memory bus width	128 bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	4000 MHz	14000 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Technologies
AMD Eyefinity
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)
Video Code Engine (VCE)
Multi Monitor
VR Ready