AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs NVIDIA Quadro T1000

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 and NVIDIA Quadro T1000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200

NVIDIA Quadro T1000

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200

Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 411 vs 404

Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	411 vs 404

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T1000

Around 51% higher core clock speed: 1395 MHz vs 925 MHz
Around 34% higher boost clock speed: 1455 MHz vs 1082 MHz
2x more texture fill rate: 69.84 GTexel/s vs 34.62 GTexel/s
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
Around 30% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 65 Watt
2x more memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 4000 MHz
2.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6494 vs 2398
2.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 32981 vs 14219
3.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 87.83 vs 25.896
3.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9009 vs 2524
Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 vs 3274
3.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9009 vs 2524
Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 vs 3274

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	1395 MHz vs 925 MHz
Boost clock speed	1455 MHz vs 1082 MHz
Texture fill rate	69.84 GTexel/s vs 34.62 GTexel/s
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm vs 14 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	50 Watt vs 65 Watt
Memory clock speed	8000 MHz vs 4000 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	6494 vs 2398
Geekbench - OpenCL	32981 vs 14219
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	87.83 vs 25.896
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	9009 vs 2524
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3718 vs 3274
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3359 vs 3352
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	9009 vs 2524
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3718 vs 3274
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3359 vs 3352

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro T1000

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

2398

6494

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

411

404

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

14219

32981

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

25.896

87.83

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2524

9009

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3274

3718

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3352

3359

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2524

9009

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3274

3718

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3352

3359

Name	AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200	NVIDIA Quadro T1000
PassMark - G3D Mark	2398	6494
PassMark - G2D Mark	411	404
Geekbench - OpenCL	14219	32981
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	25.896	87.83
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	486.804
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	2.503
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	53.111
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	100.658
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2524	9009
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3274	3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3352	3359
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2524	9009
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3274	3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3352	3359

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200	NVIDIA Quadro T1000
Essentials
Architecture	Polaris	Turing
Code name	Lexa	TU117
Launch date	27 May 2019	27 May 2019
Launch price (MSRP)	$199
Place in performance rating	841	400
Type	Workstation	Mobile Workstation
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1082 MHz	1455 MHz
Compute units	10
Core clock speed	925 MHz	1395 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	12 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	86.56 GFLOPS	69.84 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	1,385 GFLOPS	4.470 TFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	1,385 GFLOPS	2.235 TFLOPS
Pixel fill rate	17.31 GPixel/s	46.56 GPixel/s
Stream Processors	640
Texture fill rate	34.62 GTexel/s	69.84 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	65 Watt	50 Watt
Transistor count	2200 million	4700 million
Pipelines		768
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	4x mini-DisplayPort	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Height	Half Height
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	6.6" (168 mm)
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
API support
DirectX	12.0	12.1
OpenCL	2.0	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Shader Model	6.4	6.4
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	4 GB
Memory bandwidth	96 GB/s	128 GB/s
Memory bus width	128 bit	128 bit
Memory clock speed	4000 MHz	8000 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Technologies
AMD Eyefinity
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)
Video Code Engine (VCE)