AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 vs AMD Radeon HD 7970M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 and AMD Radeon HD 7970M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 6 month(s) later
• Around 32% higher core clock speed: 1125 MHz vs 850 MHz
• Around 13% higher texture fill rate: 76.86 GTexel / s vs 68 GTexel / s
• Around 13% better floating-point performance: 2,460 gflops vs 2,176 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 2x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 100 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
• Around 25% higher memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 4800 MHz
• Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3654 vs 3569
• Around 27% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 630 vs 496
• Around 3% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 17715 vs 17210
• Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 55.077 vs 51.181
• Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 82.584 vs 81.527
• Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5431 vs 5094
• Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5431 vs 5094

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7970M

• Around 25% higher pipelines: 1280 vs 1024
• Around 35% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1121.002 vs 830.773
• Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.355 vs 4.132
• Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 256.99 vs 225.985
• 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3692 vs 1123
• Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3339 vs 2678
• 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3692 vs 1123
• Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3339 vs 2678

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7970M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	3654 3569
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	630 496
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	17715 17210
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	55.077 51.181
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	830.773 1121.002
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4.132 5.355
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	82.584 81.527
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	225.985 256.99
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5431 5094
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1123 3692
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2678 3339
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5431 5094
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1123 3692
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2678 3339

Compare specifications (specs)