AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100
- Around 32% higher texture fill rate: 76.86 GTexel / s vs 58.2 GTexel / s
- Around 60% higher pipelines: 1024 vs 640
- Around 32% better floating-point performance: 2,460 gflops vs 1,862 gflops
- Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 75 Watt
- Around 39% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 634 vs 457
- Around 2% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 17730 vs 17464
- Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 830.773 vs 799.414
- 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 82.584 vs 30.523
- Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 225.985 vs 223.683
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 76.86 GTexel / s vs 58.2 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1024 vs 640 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,460 gflops vs 1,862 gflops |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 75 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 634 vs 457 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 17730 vs 17464 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 830.773 vs 799.414 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 82.584 vs 30.523 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 225.985 vs 223.683 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)
- Around 15% higher core clock speed: 1290 MHz vs 1125 MHz
- Around 16% higher boost clock speed: 1392 MHz vs 1201 MHz
- Around 17% higher memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 6000 MHz
- Around 37% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5027 vs 3676
- Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 67.209 vs 55.077
- Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.536 vs 4.132
- Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7043 vs 5431
- 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3685 vs 1123
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3360 vs 2678
- Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7043 vs 5431
- 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3685 vs 1123
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3360 vs 2678
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1290 MHz vs 1125 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1392 MHz vs 1201 MHz |
| Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz vs 6000 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5027 vs 3676 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 67.209 vs 55.077 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.536 vs 4.132 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7043 vs 5431 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3685 vs 1123 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 vs 2678 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7043 vs 5431 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3685 vs 1123 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 vs 2678 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3676 | 5027 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 634 | 457 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 17730 | 17464 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 55.077 | 67.209 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 830.773 | 799.414 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.132 | 4.536 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 82.584 | 30.523 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 225.985 | 223.683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5431 | 7043 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1123 | 3685 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2678 | 3360 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5431 | 7043 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1123 | 3685 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2678 | 3360 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 122 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Pascal |
| Code name | Baffin | GP107 |
| Launch date | 10 November 2016 | 25 October 2016 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | $109 |
| Place in performance rating | 603 | 604 |
| Price now | $259.99 | $124.99 |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 19.63 | 56.95 |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1201 MHz | 1392 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1125 MHz | 1290 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 2,460 gflops | 1,862 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 640 |
| Texture fill rate | 76.86 GTexel / s | 58.2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,000 million | 3,300 million |
| CUDA cores | 640 | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, DP 1.4, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.38" (11.1 cm) | |
| Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 300 Watt | |
| Width | 2-slot | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 96 GB / s | 112 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 7008 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Ansel | ||
| CUDA | ||
| GameStream | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| Multi-Projection | ||
| ShadowWorks | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 with others
AMDRadeon Pro WX 4100 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7800 GT
AMDRadeon Pro WX 4100 vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 1500M
AMDRadeon Pro WX 4100 vs
ATIRadeon HD 4730
AMDRadeon Pro WX 4100 vs
NVIDIAQuadro 500M
AMDRadeon Pro WX 4100 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7970M
AMDRadeon Pro WX 4100 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)
