AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 vs NVIDIA Tesla C2050

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 and NVIDIA Tesla C2050 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100

• Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 3 month(s) later
• Around 96% higher core clock speed: 1125 MHz vs 575 MHz
• 2.4x more texture fill rate: 76.86 GTexel / s vs 32.2 GTexel / s
• 2.3x more pipelines: 1024 vs 448
• 2.4x better floating-point performance: 2,460 gflops vs 1,030.4 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
• 4.8x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 238 Watt
• Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 3 GB
• 2x more memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 3000 MHz
• Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3718 vs 3176
• Around 81% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 656 vs 362
• Around 61% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 17711 vs 11024
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 55.077 vs 26.055
• Around 38% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.132 vs 2.99
• Around 98% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 82.584 vs 41.654
• 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 225.985 vs 89.869

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla C2050

• Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 901.157 vs 830.773
• 5.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 5962 vs 1123
• 3.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 9064 vs 2678
• 5.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 5962 vs 1123
• 3.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 9064 vs 2678

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla C2050

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	3718 3176
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	656 362
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	17711 11024
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	55.077 26.055
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	830.773 901.157
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4.132 2.99
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	82.584 41.654
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	225.985 89.869
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1123 5962
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2678 9064
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1123 5962
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2678 9064

Compare specifications (specs)