AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook)

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile

• Around 40% higher pipelines: 896 vs 640
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 16 nm
• Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 75 Watt
• Around 39% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 406 vs 292
• 2.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 51217 vs 17466
• Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 876.241 vs 799.414
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 64.599 vs 30.523
• Around 92% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6466 vs 3359
• Around 92% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6466 vs 3359

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook)

• Around 35% higher core clock speed: 1354 MHz vs 1002 MHz
• Around 42% higher boost clock speed: 1493 MHz vs 1053 MHz
• Around 1% higher texture fill rate: 59.72 GTexel / s vs 58.97 GTexel / s
• Around 1% better floating-point performance: 1,911 gflops vs 1,887 gflops
• Around 17% higher memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 6000 MHz
• Around 64% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4463 vs 2728
• Around 46% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 67.209 vs 46.158
• Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.536 vs 3.983
• Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 223.683 vs 194.258
• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7239 vs 3301
• Around 78% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3721 vs 2086
• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7239 vs 3301
• Around 78% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3721 vs 2086

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook)

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2728 4463
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	406 292
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	51217 17466
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	46.158 67.209
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	876.241 799.414
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3.983 4.536
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	64.599 30.523
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	194.258 223.683
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3301 7239
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2086 3721
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6466 3359
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3301 7239
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2086 3721
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6466 3359

Compare specifications (specs)