AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook)
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook) pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile
- Environ 40% de pipelines plus haut: 896 versus 640
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 16 nm
- Environ 50% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 50 Watt versus 75 Watt
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 406 versus 292
- 2.9x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 51217 versus 17466
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 876.241 versus 799.414
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 64.599 versus 30.523
- Environ 92% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6466 versus 3359
- Environ 92% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6466 versus 3359
| Caractéristiques | |
| Pipelines | 896 versus 640 |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 16 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt versus 75 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 406 versus 292 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 51217 versus 17466 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 876.241 versus 799.414 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 64.599 versus 30.523 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6466 versus 3359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6466 versus 3359 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook)
- Environ 35% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1354 MHz versus 1002 MHz
- Environ 42% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1493 MHz versus 1053 MHz
- Environ 1% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 59.72 GTexel / s versus 58.97 GTexel / s
- Environ 1% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,911 gflops versus 1,887 gflops
- Environ 17% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 7008 MHz versus 6000 MHz
- Environ 64% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 4463 versus 2728
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 67.209 versus 46.158
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.536 versus 3.983
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 223.683 versus 194.258
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7239 versus 3301
- Environ 78% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3721 versus 2086
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7239 versus 3301
- Environ 78% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3721 versus 2086
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1354 MHz versus 1002 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1493 MHz versus 1053 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 59.72 GTexel / s versus 58.97 GTexel / s |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,911 gflops versus 1,887 gflops |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 7008 MHz versus 6000 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4463 versus 2728 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 67.209 versus 46.158 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.536 versus 3.983 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 223.683 versus 194.258 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7239 versus 3301 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3721 versus 2086 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7239 versus 3301 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3721 versus 2086 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook)
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook) |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2728 | 4463 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 406 | 292 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 51217 | 17466 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 46.158 | 67.209 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 876.241 | 799.414 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.983 | 4.536 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 64.599 | 30.523 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 194.258 | 223.683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3301 | 7239 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2086 | 3721 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6466 | 3359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3301 | 7239 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2086 | 3721 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6466 | 3359 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2084 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook) | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Pascal |
| Nom de code | Baffin | GP106B |
| Date de sortie | 1 March 2017 | 1 February 2017 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 639 | 595 |
| Genre | Workstation | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1053 MHz | 1493 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1002 MHz | 1354 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,887 gflops | 1,911 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 16 nm |
| Pipelines | 896 | 640 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 58.97 GTexel / s | 59.72 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 3,000 million | 4,400 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Taille du laptop | large | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 112.0 GB / s | 112.1 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 6000 MHz | 7008 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| Multi-Projection | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile avec des autres
AMDRadeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce FX 5950 Ultra
AMDRadeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 1300
AMDRadeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce 720A
AMDRadeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon R9 360 OEM
AMDRadeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile vs
AMDFirePro S7150
AMDRadeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon RX 540 OEM
