AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4700 X2
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 4700 X2 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 19% higher core clock speed: 713 MHz vs 600 MHz
- 7x more pipelines: 1792 vs 2x 128
- 5.1x better floating-point performance: 3,892 gflops vs 2x 384.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 65 nm
- 3x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 226 Watt
- 4x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 2x 1 GB
- 3.1x more memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 1600 MHz
- 8.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5584 vs 676
- Around 53% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 777 vs 509
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 18 November 2016 vs 18 April 2008 |
Core clock speed | 713 MHz vs 600 MHz |
Pipelines | 1792 vs 2x 128 |
Floating-point performance | 3,892 gflops vs 2x 384.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 65 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 226 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 2x 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5584 vs 676 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 777 vs 509 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 4700 X2
- Around 96% higher texture fill rate: 2x 38.4 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 121.6 GTexel / s
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4196 vs 1565
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 4196 vs 1565
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 2x 38.4 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 121.6 GTexel / s |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4196 vs 1565 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4196 vs 1565 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 4700 X2
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 4700 X2 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5584 | 676 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 777 | 509 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 25596 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 87.861 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1362.14 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.025 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 106.141 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 250.267 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5579 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1691 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1565 | 4196 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5579 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1691 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1565 | 4196 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 4700 X2 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Tesla |
Code name | Ellesmere | G92 |
Launch date | 18 November 2016 | 18 April 2008 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $499 | $2,999 |
Place in performance rating | 470 | 467 |
Price now | $349.99 | |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 19.34 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1086 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 713 MHz | 600 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 3,892 gflops | 2x 384.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 1792 | 2x 128 |
Texture fill rate | 121.6 GTexel / s | 2x 38.4 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 226 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,700 million | 754 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2x 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB / s | 2x 51.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 2x 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |