AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 vs AMD FirePro W7100
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 and AMD FirePro W7100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 29% higher core clock speed: 1188 MHz vs 920 MHz
- Around 74% higher texture fill rate: 179.0 GTexel / s vs 103.0 GTexel / s
- Around 29% higher pipelines: 2304 vs 1792
- Around 74% better floating-point performance: 5,728 gflops vs 3,297 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 3.1x lower typical power consumption: 130 Watt vs 400 Watt
- Around 40% higher memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 5000 MHz
- Around 50% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7811 vs 5191
- Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 797 vs 663
- Around 58% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 39388 vs 24892
- Around 76% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 115.834 vs 65.781
- Around 59% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1987.633 vs 1248.285
- Around 73% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 10.152 vs 5.854
- Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 105.263 vs 94.086
- Around 65% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 597.677 vs 361.58
- Around 62% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10320 vs 6362
- Around 62% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10320 vs 6362
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 10 November 2016 vs 12 August 2014 |
Core clock speed | 1188 MHz vs 920 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 179.0 GTexel / s vs 103.0 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2304 vs 1792 |
Floating-point performance | 5,728 gflops vs 3,297 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt vs 400 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz vs 5000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7811 vs 5191 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 797 vs 663 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 39388 vs 24892 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 115.834 vs 65.781 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1987.633 vs 1248.285 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.152 vs 5.854 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 105.263 vs 94.086 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 597.677 vs 361.58 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10320 vs 6362 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10320 vs 6362 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W7100
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3713 vs 3575
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3713 vs 3575
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 vs 3575 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 vs 3347 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 vs 3575 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 vs 3347 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W7100
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 | AMD FirePro W7100 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7811 | 5191 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 797 | 663 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 39388 | 24892 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 115.834 | 65.781 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1987.633 | 1248.285 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.152 | 5.854 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 105.263 | 94.086 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 597.677 | 361.58 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10320 | 6362 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3575 | 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3347 | 3355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10320 | 6362 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3575 | 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3347 | 3355 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 | AMD FirePro W7100 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 3.0 |
Code name | Ellesmere | Tonga |
Launch date | 10 November 2016 | 12 August 2014 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $799 | |
Place in performance rating | 316 | 450 |
Price now | $539.99 | |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 19.25 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1243 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1188 MHz | 920 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 5,728 gflops | 3,297 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 2304 | 1792 |
Texture fill rate | 179.0 GTexel / s | 103.0 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt | 400 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,700 million | 5,000 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | 4x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort count | 4 | |
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HD сomponent video output | ||
StereoOutput3D | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 241 mm | 241 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Form factor | Full Height / Full Length | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 224.0 GB / s | 160 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
FreeSync | ||
HDMI 2.0 |