AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 vs NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 12 GB
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 and NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 12 GB videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 1% higher core clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 1190 MHz
- Around 15% higher boost clock speed: 1530 MHz vs 1329 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 9% lower typical power consumption: 230 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 40% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 1430 MHz
- Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 247.788 vs 218.069
- Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1195.863 vs 940.599
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 13 August 2018 vs 20 June 2016 |
| Core clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 1190 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1530 MHz vs 1329 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 16 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 230 Watt vs 250 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz vs 1430 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 247.788 vs 218.069 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1195.863 vs 940.599 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 12 GB
- 3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 206586 vs 69812
- Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 205.417 vs 171.616
- Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4198.719 vs 4031.404
- Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 19.996 vs 16.925
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 206586 vs 69812 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 205.417 vs 171.616 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4198.719 vs 4031.404 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 19.996 vs 16.925 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 12 GB
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 | NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 12 GB |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 13932 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 815 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 69812 | 206586 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 171.616 | 205.417 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4031.404 | 4198.719 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.925 | 19.996 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 247.788 | 218.069 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1195.863 | 940.599 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13044 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7164 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 30936 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13044 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7164 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 30936 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 | NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 12 GB | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Pascal |
| Code name | Vega 10 | GP100 |
| Launch date | 13 August 2018 | 20 June 2016 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $999 | $4,599 |
| Place in performance rating | 118 | 124 |
| Price now | $999 | |
| Type | Workstation | Workstation |
| Value for money (0-100) | 13.37 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1530 MHz | 1329 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1200 MHz | 1190 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 16 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 230 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Transistor count | 12,500 million | 15,300 million |
| Floating-point performance | 10,609 gflops | |
| Pipelines | 3584 | |
| Texture fill rate | 331.5 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm | 267 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 1x 8-pin |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | 1430 MHz |
| Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 720.9 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 4096 Bit | |
| Memory type | HBM2 | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 with others
AMDRadeon Pro WX 8200 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
AMDRadeon Pro WX 8200 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
AMDRadeon Pro WX 8200 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3080 Max-Q
AMDRadeon Pro WX 8200 vs
NVIDIARTX A5000 Mobile
AMDRadeon Pro WX 8200 vs
AppleM1 Max 24-core
AMDRadeon Pro WX 8200 vs
AppleM2 Ultra 60-core
