AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL vs ATI FirePro RG220
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL and ATI FirePro RG220 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 86% higher core clock speed: 931 MHz vs 500 MHz
- 20220x more texture fill rate: 80.88 GTexel/s vs 4 GTexel / s
- 16x more pipelines: 1280 vs 80
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 55 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 512 MB
- 13.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4643 vs 335
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 February 2018 vs 1 May 2008 |
Core clock speed | 931 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 80.88 GTexel/s vs 4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1280 vs 80 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 55 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 512 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4643 vs 335 |
Reasons to consider the ATI FirePro RG220
- 2.3x more memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 700 MHz (1400 MHz effective)
- Around 36% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 552 vs 405
Specifications (specs) | |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz vs 700 MHz (1400 MHz effective) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 552 vs 405 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
GPU 2: ATI FirePro RG220
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL | ATI FirePro RG220 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 405 | 552 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4643 | 335 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL | ATI FirePro RG220 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | TeraScale |
Code name | Polaris 22 | RV711 |
Launch date | 1 February 2018 | 1 May 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 260 | 261 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1011 MHz | |
Compute performance | 20 | |
Core clock speed | 931 MHz | 500 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 55 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 161.8 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 2.588 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 2.588 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1280 | 80 |
Pixel fill rate | 32.35 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 80.88 GTexel/s | 4 GTexel / s |
Texture Units | 65 Watt | |
Transistor count | 5000 million | 242 million |
Floating-point performance | 80 gflops | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DMS-59 |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | IGP | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 10.1 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Shader Model | 6.3 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 179.2 GB/s | 51.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 1024 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 700 MHz (1400 MHz effective) | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | HBM2 | GDDR3 |
Technologies |
||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) |