NVIDIA T400 4GB vs AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA T400 4GB and AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA T400 4GB
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 41% higher boost clock speed: 1425 MHz vs 1011 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- Around 79% higher memory clock speed: 1250 MHz, 10 Gbps effective vs 700 MHz (1400 MHz effective)
- Around 61% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 654 vs 405
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 6 May 2021 vs 1 February 2018 |
Boost clock speed | 1425 MHz vs 1011 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz, 10 Gbps effective vs 700 MHz (1400 MHz effective) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 654 vs 405 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
- 2.2x more core clock speed: 931 MHz vs 420 MHz
- 2.4x more texture fill rate: 80.88 GTexel/s vs 34.20 GTexel/s
- 3.3x more pipelines: 1280 vs 384
- Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4643 vs 3767
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 931 MHz vs 420 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 80.88 GTexel/s vs 34.20 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 1280 vs 384 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4643 vs 3767 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA T400 4GB
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA T400 4GB | AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 654 | 405 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3767 | 4643 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 17225 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA T400 4GB | AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | TU117 | Polaris 22 |
Launch date | 6 May 2021 | 1 February 2018 |
Place in performance rating | 259 | 260 |
Type | Mobile workstation | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1425 MHz | 1011 MHz |
Core clock speed | 420 MHz | 931 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 34.20 GFLOPS (1:32) | 161.8 GFLOPS |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 2.189 TFLOPS (2:1) | 2.588 TFLOPS |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1,094 GFLOPS | 2.588 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 384 | 1280 |
Pixel fill rate | 22.80 GPixel/s | 32.35 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 34.20 GTexel/s | 80.88 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | |
Transistor count | 4700 million | 5000 million |
Compute performance | 20 | |
Texture Units | 65 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Single-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | IGP |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 200 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 (6.4) | 6.3 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 80.00 GB/s | 179.2 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | 1024 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz, 10 Gbps effective | 700 MHz (1400 MHz effective) |
Memory type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
Technologies |
||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) |